Emily A. Kuhl
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- David J. KupferDarrel A. RegierWilliam E. NarrowDiana E. ClarkeSamuel F. SearsHelena C. KraemerS. Janet KuramotoJamie B. Conti
- Topics
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (13 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emily A. Kuhl
36 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 909
- Psychiatry and Mental health 809
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 599
- Cognitive Neuroscience 442
Countries citing papers authored by Emily A. Kuhl
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A. Kuhl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A. Kuhl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A. Kuhl more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A. Kuhl
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A. Kuhl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A. Kuhl. The network helps show where Emily A. Kuhl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily A. Kuhl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily A. Kuhl. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily A. Kuhl based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily A. Kuhl. Emily A. Kuhl is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 57 | |
| 5 | 191 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 96 | |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | 47 | |
| 13 | 226 | |
| 14 | 85 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 92 | |
| 17 | 37 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Emily A. Kuhl
Emily A. Kuhl is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (13 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (11 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (809 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (599 citations). Emily A. Kuhl has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David J. Kupfer, Darrel A. Regier, William E. Narrow, Diana E. Clarke, Samuel F. Sears, Helena C. Kraemer, S. Janet Kuramoto, Jamie B. Conti, Adrienne H. Kovacs and Roy C. Ziegelstein. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, American Journal of Psychiatry and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.