Emily A Clarke
- Epidemiology
- Oncology
- General Health Professions
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- T.W. AndersonStephen D. WalterJennifer HatcherGordon M. LickrishJuanita HatcherGail McKeown‐EyssenJohn McLaughlinTerence W. Anderson
- Topics
- Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Emily A Clarke
11 papers receiving 416 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Epidemiology 248
- Oncology 220
- General Health Professions 63
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Emily A Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily A Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily A Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily A Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily A Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily A Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily A Clarke. The network helps show where Emily A Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily A Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily A Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily A Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily A Clarke. Emily A Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cervical cancer screening: are the 1989 recommendations still valid? National Workshop on Screening for Cancer of the Cervix. | 20 |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | 82 | |
| 4 | 75 | |
| 5 | Second primary cancer following treatment for cervical cancer. | 12 |
| 6 | Problems in determining the incidence of cervical cancer. | 3 |
| 7 | 205 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Radiographic features of Hodgkin's disease. | 5 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | Influence of modern radiological techniques on clinical staging of malignant lymphomas. | 13 |
About Emily A Clarke
Emily A Clarke is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (220 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations) and Epidemiology (248 citations). Emily A Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include T.W. Anderson, Stephen D. Walter, Jennifer Hatcher, Gordon M. Lickrish, Juanita Hatcher, Gail McKeown‐Eyssen, John McLaughlin, Terence W. Anderson, E. Diane Nishri and James W. Davidson. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.