Emilie Bosc

607 total citations
9 papers, 335 citations indexed

About

Emilie Bosc is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Signal Processing and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emilie Bosc has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 335 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6 papers in Signal Processing and 1 paper in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Emilie Bosc's work include Image and Video Quality Assessment (8 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers) and Video Coding and Compression Technologies (6 papers). Emilie Bosc is often cited by papers focused on Image and Video Quality Assessment (8 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (6 papers) and Video Coding and Compression Technologies (6 papers). Emilie Bosc collaborates with scholars based in France, Italy and Germany. Emilie Bosc's co-authors include Patrick Le Callet, Muriel Pressigout, Luce Morin, Romuald Pépion, Marco Carli, Federica Battisti, Patrick Ndjiki-Nya, Martin Köppel, Miguel Barreda-Ángeles and Touradj Ebrahimi and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Signal Processing Image Communication and Annals of Telecommunications.

In The Last Decade

Emilie Bosc

9 papers receiving 327 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emilie Bosc France 7 322 87 64 25 21 9 335
Romuald Pépion France 12 436 1.4× 107 1.2× 68 1.1× 46 1.8× 62 3.0× 15 464
Alexandre Ninassi France 5 286 0.9× 87 1.0× 31 0.5× 49 2.0× 27 1.3× 6 296
Wilfried M. Osberger Australia 6 249 0.8× 40 0.5× 43 0.7× 46 1.8× 8 0.4× 10 264
Yin Zhao China 7 280 0.9× 55 0.6× 139 2.2× 31 1.2× 9 0.4× 16 305
Klaus Hopf Germany 8 196 0.6× 187 2.1× 94 1.5× 64 2.6× 40 1.9× 22 330
Romain Cousseau France 5 313 1.0× 219 2.5× 27 0.4× 91 3.6× 25 1.2× 6 345
Caroline Conti Portugal 12 456 1.4× 136 1.6× 138 2.2× 10 0.4× 12 0.6× 27 473
Bernard Mendiburu 4 194 0.6× 143 1.6× 19 0.3× 46 1.8× 5 0.2× 6 260
Danyang Tu China 6 168 0.5× 57 0.7× 9 0.1× 12 0.5× 8 0.4× 9 226
Mahdi Nezamabadi United States 9 257 0.8× 43 0.5× 42 0.7× 34 1.4× 187 8.9× 16 327

Countries citing papers authored by Emilie Bosc

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emilie Bosc's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emilie Bosc with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emilie Bosc more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emilie Bosc

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emilie Bosc. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emilie Bosc. The network helps show where Emilie Bosc may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emilie Bosc

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emilie Bosc. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emilie Bosc based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emilie Bosc. Emilie Bosc is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Battisti, Federica, et al.. (2014). Objective image quality assessment of 3D synthesized views. Signal Processing Image Communication. 30. 78–88. 108 indexed citations
2.
Hanhart, Philippe, Emilie Bosc, Patrick Le Callet, & Touradj Ebrahimi. (2014). Free-viewpoint video sequences: A new challenge for objective quality metrics. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 2. 1–6. 6 indexed citations
3.
Barreda-Ángeles, Miguel, et al.. (2014). Exploring the effects of 3D visual discomfort on viewers' emotions. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 753–757. 14 indexed citations
4.
Quilès, Clélia, Emilie Bosc, & Hélène Verdoux. (2013). Altérations cognitives et plaintes mnésiques lors d’un traitement par électroconvulsivothérapie : revue de la littérature. Annales Médico-psychologiques revue psychiatrique. 171(5). 285–294. 2 indexed citations
5.
Bosc, Emilie, et al.. (2013). A study of depth/texture bit-rate allocation in multi-view video plus depth compression. Annals of Telecommunications. 68(11-12). 615–625. 10 indexed citations
6.
Bosc, Emilie, Federica Battisti, Marco Carli, & Patrick Le Callet. (2013). A wavelet-based image quality metric for the assessment of 3D synthesized views. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8648. 86481Z–86481Z. 10 indexed citations
7.
Bosc, Emilie, Patrick Le Callet, Luce Morin, & Muriel Pressigout. (2012). An edge-based structural distortion indicator for the quality assessment of 3D synthesized views. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 249–252. 16 indexed citations
8.
Bosc, Emilie, Romuald Pépion, Patrick Le Callet, et al.. (2011). Towards a New Quality Metric for 3-D Synthesized View Assessment. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing. 5(7). 1332–1343. 156 indexed citations
9.
Bosc, Emilie, Romuald Pépion, Patrick Le Callet, et al.. (2011). Perceived quality of DIBR-based synthesized views. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8135. 81350I–81350I. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026