Emil Schmid

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Emil Schmid is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Organic Chemistry and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, Emil Schmid has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 2 papers in Organic Chemistry and 2 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in Emil Schmid's work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (1 paper). Emil Schmid is often cited by papers focused on Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers) and Membrane Separation and Gas Transport (1 paper). Emil Schmid collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland. Emil Schmid's co-authors include John Gaudin, John Ryals, Bruno Inverardi, E. R. Ward, W. Blum, Jean‐Pierre Métraux, Ernst Küsters, Firoz D. Antia, M. Bailly and Roger‐Marc Nicoud and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Chromatography A and Organic Process Research & Development.

In The Last Decade

Emil Schmid

6 papers receiving 963 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Increase in Salicylic Acid at the Onset of Systemic Acquired Resistance in Cucumber

1990 762 citations Jean‐Pierre Métraux, John Ryals et al. Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emil Schmid Switzerland	6	709	369	129	93	88	6	1.0k
De Buys Scott South Africa	9	676 1.0×	200 0.5×	22 0.2×	31 0.3×	44 0.5×	11	866
T. Stuchbury United Kingdom	17	358 0.5×	407 1.1×	23 0.2×	22 0.2×	62 0.7×	28	704
Thomas Maetzke Switzerland	13	560 0.8×	279 0.8×	67 0.5×	13 0.1×	405 4.6×	18	1.1k
I. Muckenschnabel Germany	11	258 0.4×	259 0.7×	30 0.2×	23 0.2×	38 0.4×	13	539
Gilbert Alibert France	20	796 1.1×	750 2.0×	30 0.2×	49 0.5×	28 0.3×	69	1.1k
Colin H. Doy Australia	21	442 0.6×	1.1k 3.0×	28 0.2×	89 1.0×	67 0.8×	37	1.3k
Simon Fielder New Zealand	12	344 0.5×	216 0.6×	16 0.1×	28 0.3×	132 1.5×	22	707
Marie-Andrée Hartmann France	14	710 1.0×	1.0k 2.8×	22 0.2×	25 0.3×	47 0.5×	16	1.4k
Yoshimoto Ohta Japan	17	416 0.6×	396 1.1×	45 0.3×	13 0.1×	172 2.0×	49	859
C.F. de Jong Netherlands	10	358 0.5×	201 0.5×	47 0.4×	12 0.1×	53 0.6×	13	564

Countries citing papers authored by Emil Schmid

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emil Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emil Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emil Schmid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emil Schmid

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emil Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emil Schmid. The network helps show where Emil Schmid may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emil Schmid

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emil Schmid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emil Schmid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emil Schmid. Emil Schmid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Mickel, Stuart J., Daniel Niederer, Robert Daeffler, et al.. (2003). Large-Scale Synthesis of the Anti-Cancer Marine Natural Product (+)-Discodermolide. Part 5: Linkage of Fragments C₁_-₆ and C₇_-₂₄ and Finale. Organic Process Research & Development. 8(1). 122–130. 100 indexed citations

2.

Hoffmann, Matthias, et al.. (1998). Separation of (R)- and (S)-tert-butyl 2-tert-butyl-4-methoxy-2,5-dihydro-1,3-imidazole-1-carboxylate (building block for amino acid synthesis) by preparative high performance liquid chromatography on a polysaccharide stationary phase. Chirality. 10(3). 217–222. 9 indexed citations

3.

Küsters, Ernst, et al.. (1994). Enantiomeric separation of chiral sulphoxides. Journal of Chromatography A. 666(1-2). 421–432. 62 indexed citations

4.

Nicoud, Roger‐Marc, et al.. (1993). Preparative scale enantioseparation of a chiral epoxide: Comparison of liquid chromatography and simulated moving bed adsorption technology. Chirality. 5(4). 267–271. 89 indexed citations

5.

Métraux, Jean‐Pierre, John Ryals, E. R. Ward, et al.. (1990). Increase in Salicylic Acid at the Onset of Systemic Acquired Resistance in Cucumber. Science. 250(4983). 1004–1006. 762 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Schmid, Emil. (1970). Die Abgrenzung der Vegetationsgürtel im Mittelmeergebiet. Feddes Repertorium. 81(1-5). 203–213. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact