Emelia DeForce

13 total papers · 1.0k total citations
8 papers, 728 citations indexed

About

Emelia DeForce is a scholar working on Ecology, Pollution and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emelia DeForce has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 728 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Pollution and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Emelia DeForce's work include Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (3 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers) and Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2 papers). Emelia DeForce is often cited by papers focused on Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (3 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (2 papers) and Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (2 papers). Emelia DeForce collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and France. Emelia DeForce's co-authors include G. Proskurowski, Deborah S. Goodwin, Erik Zettler, Kara Lavender Law, Tobias Kukulka, Loïs Maignien, A. Murat Eren, Meghan Chafee, Sheri L. Simmons and Amy Apprill and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and The FASEB Journal.

In The Last Decade

Emelia DeForce

7 papers receiving 706 citations

Hit Papers

Distribution of Surface P... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Emelia DeForce 357 256 167 129 85 8 728
Carolina Monteiro 270 0.8× 100 0.4× 72 0.4× 41 0.3× 80 0.9× 22 633
Meng‐Hsuen Chiu 384 1.1× 120 0.5× 228 1.4× 88 0.7× 103 1.2× 21 808
Adam Ossowicki 462 1.3× 236 0.9× 309 1.9× 136 1.1× 96 1.1× 16 893
Anne Moné 315 0.9× 165 0.6× 42 0.3× 188 1.5× 130 1.5× 18 796
Uta Böckelmann 269 0.8× 84 0.3× 26 0.2× 195 1.5× 153 1.8× 16 699
Caroline Pandin 317 0.9× 182 0.7× 212 1.3× 85 0.7× 146 1.7× 8 653
Fang Lin 97 0.3× 81 0.3× 148 0.9× 141 1.1× 31 0.4× 24 691
Huxley Mae Makonde 343 1.0× 207 0.8× 110 0.7× 110 0.9× 93 1.1× 20 655
Jiajing Yang 612 1.7× 210 0.8× 12 0.1× 19 0.1× 131 1.5× 5 756
Karen Budwill 145 0.4× 21 0.1× 73 0.4× 150 1.2× 225 2.6× 12 755

Countries citing papers authored by Emelia DeForce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emelia DeForce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emelia DeForce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emelia DeForce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emelia DeForce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emelia DeForce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emelia DeForce. The network helps show where Emelia DeForce may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emelia DeForce

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emelia DeForce. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emelia DeForce based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emelia DeForce. Emelia DeForce is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026