Emanuele De Vito
About
In The Last Decade
Emanuele De Vito
2 papers receiving 82 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 68
- Infectious Diseases 44
- Insect Science 23
- Plant Science 19
- Parasitology 11
Countries citing papers authored by Emanuele De Vito
This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuele De Vito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuele De Vito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuele De Vito more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuele De Vito
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuele De Vito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuele De Vito. The network helps show where Emanuele De Vito may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emanuele De Vito
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emanuele De Vito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emanuele De Vito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emanuele De Vito. Emanuele De Vito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 76 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.