Eman Al Qasim
About
In The Last Decade
Eman Al Qasim
5 papers receiving 157 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Neurology 71
- Clinical Psychology 61
- Infectious Diseases 45
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 27
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 17
Countries citing papers authored by Eman Al Qasim
This map shows the geographic impact of Eman Al Qasim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eman Al Qasim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eman Al Qasim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eman Al Qasim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eman Al Qasim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eman Al Qasim. The network helps show where Eman Al Qasim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eman Al Qasim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eman Al Qasim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eman Al Qasim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eman Al Qasim. Eman Al Qasim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 111 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.