This map shows the geographic impact of Elżbieta Kuta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elżbieta Kuta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elżbieta Kuta more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elżbieta Kuta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elżbieta Kuta. The network helps show where Elżbieta Kuta may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elżbieta Kuta
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elżbieta Kuta.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elżbieta Kuta based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elżbieta Kuta. Elżbieta Kuta is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2019). Newborn screening for sickle cell disease at Kisumu County Hospital, Kisumu –Kenya. East African Medical Journal. 96(2). 2419–2429.2 indexed citations
5.
Szczepaniak, Magdalena, et al.. (2016). Natural hybridization between Gladiolus palustris and G. imbricatus inferred from morphological, molecular and reproductive evidence.. Preslia. 88(1).10 indexed citations
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2008). Developmental biology of Arabidopsis thaliana At1g67580 mutant. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Zoologia. 50(1).1 indexed citations
9.
Bożek, Monika, et al.. (2005). Is the blue zinc violet [Viola guestphalica Nauenb.] a taxon of hybrid origin? Evidence from embryology. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 47(1).19 indexed citations
10.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2004). Imprinting genomowy u roslin. Postepy Biologii Komorki. 31(2). 353–371.1 indexed citations
11.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2002). Autonomous endosperm development in unpollinated ovaries of Brassica napus L. cv. Topas cultured in vitro. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 44.6 indexed citations
12.
Przywara, L. & Elżbieta Kuta. (2001). The role of polyploidy in moss evolution. 38(2).1 indexed citations
13.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2000). Embryological analysis of unfertilized ovules of tomato [Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.] cultured in vitro. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Zoologia. 42(1).1 indexed citations
14.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (2000). Embryological analysis of unpollinated ovaries of Viola L. cultured in vitro. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia. Series Zoologia. 42(1).2 indexed citations
15.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (1999). In vitro culture of unfertilized ovules of Viola odorata L.. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 41(41).11 indexed citations
16.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (1998). Autonomous endosperm formation in in vitro culture of unpollinated ovules of Viola odorata L.. Folia Morphologica. 57(1). 71–71.3 indexed citations
17.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (1997). Callus induction and gametophyte regeneration in moss cultures. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica. 39.8 indexed citations
18.
Kuta, Elżbieta, Ryszard Ochyra, & L. Przywara. (1995). Chromosome studies on Polish bryophytes: VII. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica. 40(1).3 indexed citations
19.
Przywara, L., Elżbieta Kuta, & Ryszard Ochyra. (1984). Cytological studies on Antarctic mossess. II.. Journal of The Hattori Botanical Laboratory. 127–137.1 indexed citations
20.
Kuta, Elżbieta, et al.. (1971). Cytological and embryological studies in Sonchus L. I. Sonchus asper (L.) Hill. and Sonchus oleraceus L. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia s Botanica.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.