Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start
2018231 citationsMario Dobrovnik, David M. Herold et al.SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Elmar Fürst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elmar Fürst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elmar Fürst more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elmar Fürst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elmar Fürst. The network helps show where Elmar Fürst may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elmar Fürst
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elmar Fürst.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elmar Fürst based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elmar Fürst. Elmar Fürst is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Dobrovnik, Mario, David M. Herold, Elmar Fürst, & Sebastian Kummer. (2018). Blockchain for and in Logistics: What to Adopt and Where to Start. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(3). 18–18.231 indexed citations breakdown →
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2013). Best and Bad Practices in Public Transport: Approaches to a Barrier-Free Design for the Visually and Hearing Impaired. WU Research.3 indexed citations
Fürst, Elmar. (2012). Free Riders and Ticket Fraud in Public Transport: a Delphi Analysis. WU Research.1 indexed citations
12.
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2012). Sight Impaired in Public Transport Revisited - An Investigation of Perception Gaps Between Sight Impaired and Public Transport Companies. WU Research.2 indexed citations
13.
Kummer, Sebastian, et al.. (2012). Spin-Off Functions of XFCD Technology for Public Use in ITS. WU Research.1 indexed citations
14.
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2012). Calculation of CO₂ Emissions for Partial Loads and Mixed Laden Transport Units in Multilevel Transport Chains with www.co₂-tec.com. WU Research.1 indexed citations
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2011). Mobility of the sight impaired in public transport: evidence from two consecutive research projects in Austria. WU Research.1 indexed citations
19.
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2011). Environmental management of transport companies: an economic necessity or commercial gimmick - results of three research projects in the Austrian transport sector. WU Research.2 indexed citations
20.
Fürst, Elmar, et al.. (2010). Flagging Out as a Popular Strategy of Road Freight Transport Companies. Evidence of Three Consecutive Research Projects in Austria. WU Research.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.