Ellie Gresham
About
In The Last Decade
Ellie Gresham
7 papers receiving 346 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 216
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 194
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 161
- Nutrition and Dietetics 51
- General Health Professions 49
Countries citing papers authored by Ellie Gresham
This map shows the geographic impact of Ellie Gresham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellie Gresham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellie Gresham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ellie Gresham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellie Gresham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellie Gresham. The network helps show where Ellie Gresham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ellie Gresham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ellie Gresham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ellie Gresham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ellie Gresham. Ellie Gresham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 101 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 53 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.