Ellen Schlette

67 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Ellen Schlette
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Genetics 1.3k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
  • Hematology 412
  • Immunology 632
  • Oncology 700
Replace Thomas E. Boyd with:
Thomas E. Boyd United States
Stephen E. Spurgeon United States
Mats Merup Sweden
Sarah E. M. Herman United States
Katja Zirlik Germany
Antonella Zucchetto Italy
Cheson Bd United States
Enrico Tiacci Italy
Krimo Bouabdallah France
Riccardo Bomben Italy
Ellen Schlette relative to Thomas E. Boyd United States Thomas E. Boyd's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Thomas E. Boyd · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Schlette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Schlette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Schlette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Schlette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Schlette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Schlette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Schlette. The network helps show where Ellen Schlette may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Schlette, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Schlette Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Schlette links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008304
2 2011139
3 2004123
4 2005110
5 201497
6 201196
7 200284
8 200684
9 201080
10 200873
11 200166
12 200864
13 200358
14 200856
15 201154
16 201353
17 200147
18 200645
19 200842
20 201739

About Ellen Schlette

Ellen Schlette is a scholar working on Genetics, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (44 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (43 papers), Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders (14 papers), Viral-associated cancers and disorders (10 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (8 papers), Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments (6 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers) and CNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.3k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.3k citations), Hematology (412 citations), Immunology (632 citations) and Oncology (700 citations). Ellen Schlette has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Greece and Australia. Frequent co-authors include L. Jeffrey Medeiros, Michael J. Keating, Raymond Lai, George Z. Rassidakis, William G. Wierda, Susan O’Brien, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Francisco Vega, Lynne V. Abruzzo and Zeev Estrov. Their work appears in journals such as Blood, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Cancer and Human Pathology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact