Elke Kemper
About
In The Last Decade
Elke Kemper
7 papers receiving 683 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Plant Science 584
- Molecular Biology 582
- Biotechnology 168
- Immunology 20
- Biochemistry 15
Countries citing papers authored by Elke Kemper
This map shows the geographic impact of Elke Kemper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elke Kemper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elke Kemper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elke Kemper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elke Kemper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elke Kemper. The network helps show where Elke Kemper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elke Kemper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elke Kemper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elke Kemper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elke Kemper. Elke Kemper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 72 | |
| 5 | New plant binary vectors with selectable markers located proximal to the left T-DNA border breakdown → | 532 |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 42 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.