Elizabeth P. Pike

1.0k total citations
10 papers, 270 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth P. Pike is a scholar working on Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth P. Pike has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 270 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth P. Pike's work include Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (6 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (4 papers). Elizabeth P. Pike is often cited by papers focused on Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (6 papers) and Marine animal studies overview (4 papers). Elizabeth P. Pike collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Elizabeth P. Pike's co-authors include Richard B. Aronson, Chris Cacciapaglia, Ruben van Hooidonk, Steven C. Amstrup, Amanda E. Bates, John F. Bruno, Stephanie Henson, Lance Morgan, Russell Moffitt and Jenna Sullivan‐Stack and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Climate Change, Sustainability and Conservation Letters.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth P. Pike

9 papers receiving 257 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth P. Pike United States 7 208 157 88 80 21 10 270
Rubén Venegas‐Li Australia 8 182 0.9× 157 1.0× 92 1.0× 52 0.7× 29 1.4× 15 270
Jennifer Beaumont New Zealand 9 183 0.9× 141 0.9× 64 0.7× 81 1.0× 40 1.9× 15 275
Ben Donnelly United States 5 197 0.9× 108 0.7× 85 1.0× 61 0.8× 44 2.1× 8 270
Daniele A. Vila‐Nova Brazil 8 171 0.8× 124 0.8× 73 0.8× 44 0.6× 50 2.4× 10 231
Susanna Fuller Canada 10 173 0.8× 187 1.2× 34 0.4× 90 1.1× 41 2.0× 23 301
Hazel O. Arceo Philippines 10 322 1.5× 284 1.8× 106 1.2× 105 1.3× 51 2.4× 15 413
Emily Saarman United States 8 276 1.3× 167 1.1× 137 1.6× 105 1.3× 44 2.1× 11 347
Ashley P. Greenley United States 6 249 1.2× 231 1.5× 72 0.8× 118 1.5× 39 1.9× 7 336
Iván Ocadiz Parra Mexico 2 268 1.3× 209 1.3× 65 0.7× 92 1.1× 45 2.1× 3 312
Brandon Owashi United States 5 163 0.8× 204 1.3× 61 0.7× 32 0.4× 57 2.7× 5 287

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth P. Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth P. Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth P. Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth P. Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth P. Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth P. Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth P. Pike. The network helps show where Elizabeth P. Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth P. Pike

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth P. Pike. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth P. Pike based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth P. Pike. Elizabeth P. Pike is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Costa, Bárbara Horta e, Elizabeth P. Pike, John Turnbull, et al.. (2025). Marine protected areas stage of establishment and level of protection are good predictors of their conservation outcomes. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 2(4). 100345–100345. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pike, Elizabeth P., Sarah O. Hameed, Kirsten Grorud‐Colvert, et al.. (2024). Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: Applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target. Conservation Letters. 17(3). 35 indexed citations
3.
Sullivan‐Stack, Jenna, et al.. (2022). Applying Marine Protected Area Frameworks to Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Sustainability. 14(10). 5971–5971. 10 indexed citations
4.
Claudet, Joachim, Natalie C. Ban, Jessica Blythe, et al.. (2022). Avoiding the misuse of other effective area-based conservation measures in the wake of the blue economy. One Earth. 5(9). 969–974. 15 indexed citations
5.
Morgan, Lance, Elizabeth P. Pike, & Russell Moffitt. (2018). How much of the ocean is protected?. Biodiversity. 1–4. 9 indexed citations
6.
Bruno, John F., Amanda E. Bates, Chris Cacciapaglia, et al.. (2018). Climate change threatens the world’s marine protected areas. Nature Climate Change. 8(6). 499–503. 178 indexed citations
7.
Jessen, Sabine, Lance Morgan, Juan Bezaury-Creel, et al.. (2017). Measuring MPAs in Continental North America: How Well Protected Are the Ocean Estates of Canada, Mexico, and the USA?. Frontiers in Marine Science. 4. 11 indexed citations
8.
Pike, Elizabeth P., et al.. (2015). SeaStates G20 2014: How much of the seas are G20 nations really protecting?. Ocean & Coastal Management. 115. 25–30. 8 indexed citations
9.
Pike, Elizabeth P.. (2008). Tidal influence on diel movement of North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) in the Bay of Fundy. DukeSpace (Duke University). 2 indexed citations
10.
Knowlton, Amy R., et al.. (2004). Aerial Surveys to Reduce Ship/Whale Collisions In the North Atlantic Right Whale Calving Ground.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rubén Venegas‐Li Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer Beaumont Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ben Donnelly Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniele A. Vila‐Nova Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susanna Fuller Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hazel O. Arceo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emily Saarman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ashley P. Greenley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Iván Ocadiz Parra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brandon Owashi
Rankless by CCL
2026