Jenna Sullivan‐Stack

1.6k total citations
19 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Jenna Sullivan‐Stack is a scholar working on Ecology, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Jenna Sullivan‐Stack has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Jenna Sullivan‐Stack's work include Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (6 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (5 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers). Jenna Sullivan‐Stack is often cited by papers focused on Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (6 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (5 papers) and Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus (4 papers). Jenna Sullivan‐Stack collaborates with scholars based in United States, Portugal and Canada. Jenna Sullivan‐Stack's co-authors include Bruce A. Menge, Sarah A. Gravem, Elizabeth B. Cerny-Chipman, Francis Chan, Ajay Verma, Kaori Sakuishi, Lionel Apétoh, Vijay K. Kuchroo, Bruce R. Blazar and Ana C. Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Journal of Experimental Medicine and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Jenna Sullivan‐Stack

17 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jenna Sullivan‐Stack United States 10 120 82 67 60 48 19 352
Jennifer I. C. Benichou Israel 15 137 1.1× 137 1.7× 24 0.4× 67 1.1× 9 0.2× 28 737
Nuria Calzada Spain 13 212 1.8× 52 0.6× 15 0.2× 19 0.3× 19 0.4× 23 459
Brenda L. Becker United States 12 260 2.2× 69 0.8× 8 0.1× 40 0.7× 19 0.4× 18 403
Melissa Williams United States 15 41 0.3× 25 0.3× 145 2.2× 65 1.1× 14 0.3× 32 613
Leslie Hansen United States 11 166 1.4× 36 0.4× 19 0.3× 38 0.6× 37 0.8× 17 373
Lisa Öberg Sweden 13 27 0.2× 149 1.8× 30 0.4× 4 0.1× 6 0.1× 45 721
Nicole Murphy Australia 11 177 1.5× 97 1.2× 7 0.1× 91 1.5× 11 0.2× 17 329
Paul Gonzalez Chile 7 52 0.4× 107 1.3× 12 0.2× 40 0.7× 7 0.1× 38 360
Lyndsay West United States 3 55 0.5× 155 1.9× 8 0.1× 23 0.4× 9 0.2× 3 532

Countries citing papers authored by Jenna Sullivan‐Stack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jenna Sullivan‐Stack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jenna Sullivan‐Stack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jenna Sullivan‐Stack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jenna Sullivan‐Stack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jenna Sullivan‐Stack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jenna Sullivan‐Stack. The network helps show where Jenna Sullivan‐Stack may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jenna Sullivan‐Stack

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jenna Sullivan‐Stack. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jenna Sullivan‐Stack based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jenna Sullivan‐Stack. Jenna Sullivan‐Stack is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Costa, Bárbara Horta e, Elizabeth P. Pike, John Turnbull, et al.. (2025). Marine protected areas stage of establishment and level of protection are good predictors of their conservation outcomes. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 2(4). 100345–100345. 2 indexed citations
2.
Villagomez, Angelo, Kirsten Grorud‐Colvert, Jenna Sullivan‐Stack, & Steven Johnson. (2025). Study protected waters newly opened up to fishing. Nature. 644(8077). 611–611.
3.
Pike, Elizabeth P., Sarah O. Hameed, Kirsten Grorud‐Colvert, et al.. (2024). Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: Applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target. Conservation Letters. 17(3). 35 indexed citations
4.
Sullivan‐Stack, Jenna, et al.. (2024). Assessing South Africa’s marine protected area quality and progress towards conservation goals: An application of The MPA Guide framework. Marine Policy. 173. 106513–106513. 1 indexed citations
5.
Urmy, Samuel S., et al.. (2022). When are bacteria really gazelles? Comparing patchy ecologies with dimensionless numbers. Ecology Letters. 25(5). 1323–1341. 4 indexed citations
6.
Aoki, Lillian R., Alexandria G. Hounshell, Dustin W. Kincaid, et al.. (2022). Preparing Aquatic Research for an Extreme Future: Call for Improved Definitions and Responsive, Multidisciplinary Approaches. BioScience. 72(6). 508–520. 10 indexed citations
7.
Krivak-Tetley, Flora E., Jenna Sullivan‐Stack, Jeff R. Garnas, et al.. (2022). Demography of an invading forest insect reunited with hosts and parasitoids from its native range. NeoBiota. 72. 81–107.
8.
Sullivan‐Stack, Jenna, et al.. (2022). Applying Marine Protected Area Frameworks to Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. Sustainability. 14(10). 5971–5971. 10 indexed citations
9.
Sullivan‐Stack, Jenna & BA Menge. (2020). Testing ecological release as a compensating mechanism for mass mortality in a keystone predator. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 637. 59–69. 2 indexed citations
10.
Sullivan‐Stack, Jenna, Curt Mazur, Daniel Wolf, et al.. (2020). Convective forces increase rostral delivery of intrathecal radiotracers and antisense oligonucleotides in the cynomolgus monkey nervous system. Journal of Translational Medicine. 18(1). 309–309. 28 indexed citations
11.
Tangen, Kevin, Ivan Nestorov, Ajay Verma, et al.. (2019). In VivoIntrathecal Tracer Dispersion in Cynomolgus Monkey Validates Wide Biodistribution Along Neuraxis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 67(4). 1122–1132. 21 indexed citations
12.
Grorud‐Colvert, Kirsten, et al.. (2019). High-profile international commitments for ocean protection: Empty promises or meaningful progress?. Marine Policy. 105. 52–66. 16 indexed citations
13.
Gravem, Sarah A., et al.. (2017). Transformative Research Is Not Easily Predicted. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 32(11). 825–834. 9 indexed citations
15.
Dobson, Howard, Matthew MacGregor Sharp, Tyler J. Wellman, et al.. (2017). The perivascular pathways for influx of cerebrospinal fluid are most efficient in the midbrain. Clinical Science. 131(22). 2745–2752. 20 indexed citations
16.
Wolf, Daniel, Jenna Sullivan‐Stack, Curt Mazur, et al.. (2016). The Effect of Bolus Volume and Mechanical Forces on the Biodistribution of ASOs Following Lumbar Intrathecal Administration in Cynomolgus Monkeys (S38.007). Neurology. 86(16_supplement). 3 indexed citations
18.
Wolf, Daniel, Jacob Hesterman, Jenna Sullivan‐Stack, et al.. (2016). Dynamic dual-isotope molecular imaging elucidates principles for optimizing intrathecal drug delivery. JCI Insight. 1(2). e85311–e85311. 36 indexed citations
19.
Sakuishi, Kaori, Lionel Apétoh, Jenna Sullivan‐Stack, et al.. (2011). Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 208(6). 1331–1331. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026