Elizabeth L. Scott
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 1%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jerzy NeymanLucien M. Le CamLucien LeCamF. N. DavidDennis K. PearlC. D. ShaneMary W. GrayD. V. Gokhale
- Topics
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers)Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (6 papers)Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Statistical Association
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCyprus
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth L. Scott
50 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 190
- Artificial Intelligence 445
- Statistics and Probability 367
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 182
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 168
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 163
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth L. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth L. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth L. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth L. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth L. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth L. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth L. Scott. The network helps show where Elizabeth L. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth L. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth L. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth L. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth L. Scott. Elizabeth L. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 112 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 309 | |
| 5 | Darwinian, neo-Darwinian, and non-Darwinian evolution | 11 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | Statistical aspect of the problem of carcinogenesis | 10 |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 99 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | On the interpretation of counts of galaxies | 3 |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 33 |
About Elizabeth L. Scott
Elizabeth L. Scott is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Theoretical Computer Science and Earth-Surface Processes, having authored 56 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (8 papers), Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation (6 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (367 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (182 citations) and Instrumentation (50 citations). Elizabeth L. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Cyprus. Frequent co-authors include Jerzy Neyman, Lucien M. Le Cam, Lucien LeCam, F. N. David, Dennis K. Pearl, C. D. Shane, Mary W. Gray, D. V. Gokhale, Jerome A. Smith and Kristine Rinn. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Statistical Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.