Elizabeth L. Middleton

653 total citations
8 papers, 511 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth L. Middleton is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth L. Middleton has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 511 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 7 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth L. Middleton's work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). Elizabeth L. Middleton is often cited by papers focused on Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). Elizabeth L. Middleton collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ecuador. Elizabeth L. Middleton's co-authors include James D. Bever, Peggy A. Schultz, Liz Koziol, Geoffrey L. House, Jonathan T. Bauer, Sarah Richardson, Zhanna Yermakov, Jeremiah A. Henning, Keith M. Vogelsang and Jéssica Duchicela and has published in prestigious journals such as New Phytologist, BioScience and Restoration Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth L. Middleton

8 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elizabeth L. Middleton United States 6 366 271 126 123 121 8 511
Lauren M. Smith‐Ramesh United States 6 343 0.9× 202 0.7× 131 1.0× 75 0.6× 77 0.6× 9 458
Cathy Zabinski United States 8 272 0.7× 174 0.6× 99 0.8× 74 0.6× 120 1.0× 10 471
Asem A. Akhmetzhanova Russia 6 369 1.0× 167 0.6× 81 0.6× 169 1.4× 59 0.5× 15 456
David García de León Spain 12 359 1.0× 151 0.6× 117 0.9× 212 1.7× 51 0.4× 17 481
Milagros Barceló Netherlands 8 397 1.1× 219 0.8× 79 0.6× 205 1.7× 140 1.2× 8 591
Lena Neuenkamp Estonia 14 460 1.3× 276 1.0× 132 1.0× 265 2.2× 131 1.1× 28 672
Saleh Rahimlou Estonia 7 315 0.9× 152 0.6× 62 0.5× 122 1.0× 58 0.5× 18 427
Liis Kasari Estonia 9 168 0.5× 259 1.0× 160 1.3× 112 0.9× 103 0.9× 10 411
Kasper van Acker Belgium 9 234 0.6× 104 0.4× 102 0.8× 117 1.0× 78 0.6× 14 382
Xiaolong Zhou China 11 211 0.6× 162 0.6× 100 0.8× 72 0.6× 120 1.0× 33 454

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth L. Middleton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth L. Middleton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth L. Middleton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth L. Middleton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth L. Middleton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth L. Middleton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth L. Middleton. The network helps show where Elizabeth L. Middleton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth L. Middleton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth L. Middleton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth L. Middleton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth L. Middleton. Elizabeth L. Middleton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Middleton, Elizabeth L., et al.. (2022). Trade‐offs associated with occupancy models in a multispecies grassland plant population study. Ecosphere. 13(5). 3 indexed citations
2.
Koziol, Liz, Peggy A. Schultz, Geoffrey L. House, et al.. (2018). Data from: The plant microbiome and native plant restoration: the example of native mycorrhizal fungi. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
3.
Middleton, Elizabeth L., et al.. (2018). Anthropogenic and soil environmental drivers of arbuscular mycorrhizal community composition differ between grassland ecosystems. Botany. 97(1). 85–99. 18 indexed citations
4.
Koziol, Liz, Peggy A. Schultz, Geoffrey L. House, et al.. (2018). The Plant Microbiome and Native Plant Restoration: The Example of Native Mycorrhizal Fungi. BioScience. 68(12). 996–1006. 126 indexed citations
5.
Middleton, Elizabeth L., Sarah Richardson, Liz Koziol, et al.. (2015). Locally adapted arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve vigor and resistance to herbivory of native prairie plant species. Ecosphere. 6(12). 1–16. 96 indexed citations
6.
Duchicela, Jéssica, Keith M. Vogelsang, Peggy A. Schultz, et al.. (2012). Non‐native plants and soil microbes: potential contributors to the consistent reduction in soil aggregate stability caused by the disturbance of North American grasslands. New Phytologist. 196(1). 212–222. 48 indexed citations
7.
Middleton, Elizabeth L. & James D. Bever. (2010). Inoculation with a Native Soil Community Advances Succession in a Grassland Restoration. Restoration Ecology. 20(2). 218–226. 141 indexed citations
8.
Middleton, Elizabeth L., James D. Bever, & Peggy A. Schultz. (2009). The Effect of Restoration Methods on the Quality of the Restoration and Resistance to Invasion by Exotics. Restoration Ecology. 18(2). 181–187. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026