Elizabeth Krebs
- Ecology top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- David J. GreenRobert D. MagrathCatherine A. StatonJoão Ricardo Nickenig VissociDavid GreenGregory J. RobertsonAnna M. CalvertStephen Rulisa
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (17 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Krebs
40 papers receiving 811 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Ecology 472
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 301
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 113
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 90
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Krebs
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Krebs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Krebs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Krebs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Krebs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Krebs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Krebs. The network helps show where Elizabeth Krebs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Krebs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Krebs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Krebs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Krebs. Elizabeth Krebs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 22 | |
| 10 | 45 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 35 |
About Elizabeth Krebs
Elizabeth Krebs is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Parasitology and Ecology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (17 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (11 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (60 citations), Ecology (472 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (301 citations). Elizabeth Krebs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David J. Green, Robert D. Magrath, Catherine A. Staton, João Ricardo Nickenig Vissoci, David Green, Gregory J. Robertson, Anna M. Calvert, Stephen Rulisa, Craig S. Machtans and Richard Elliot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Ecology, Animal Behaviour and Landscape and Urban Planning.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.