Elizabeth Jenkins
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.1%
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies 71
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 58
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 26
- High-Energy Particle Collisions Research 24
- Neutrino Physics Research 10
- Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena 8
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 13
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories 5
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
Elizabeth Jenkins
76 papers receiving 6.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 6.1k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 762
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 156
- Condensed Matter Physics 100
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 194
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Jenkins
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Jenkins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Jenkins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Jenkins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Jenkins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Jenkins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Jenkins. The network helps show where Elizabeth Jenkins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Elizabeth Jenkins, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 56 | |
| 6 | Low-energy effective field theory below the electroweak scale: operators and matchingbreakdown → | 2018 | 203 |
| 7 | 2018 | 138 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 87 | |
| 9 | Holomorphy in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory | 2014 | 1 |
| 10 | 2014 | 49 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2003 | 39 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 41 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 126 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 19 | Baryon chiral perturbation theory | 1991 | 27 |
| 20 | 1987 | 52 |
About Elizabeth Jenkins
Elizabeth Jenkins is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 80 papers that have together received 6.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (71 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (58 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (26 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (24 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (10 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.1k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (762 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (156 citations). Elizabeth Jenkins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Aneesh V. Manohar, Michael Trott, Rodrigo Alonso, Roger Dashen, Peter Stoffer, Mark B. Wise, Howard Georgi, Elizabeth H. Simmons, Richard F. Lebed and Martin J. Savage. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.