Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Cancer Research
- Pharmacology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Robert VinkJulie GavardM. N. GhabrielNicolas BidèreEmma ThorntonLucas TrepsEva María Galán‐MoyaDamien Ricard
- Topics
- Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers)Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (6 papers)Brain Metastases and Treatment (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe EMBO JournalPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- AustraliaFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
20 papers receiving 492 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Molecular Biology 248
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 145
- Cancer Research 95
- Pharmacology 77
- Psychiatry and Mental health 65
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Harford‐Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Harford‐Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Harford‐Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Harford‐Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Harford‐Wright. The network helps show where Elizabeth Harford‐Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Harford‐Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Harford‐Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Harford‐Wright. Elizabeth Harford‐Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 70 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 94 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About Elizabeth Harford‐Wright
Elizabeth Harford‐Wright is a scholar working on Genetics, Neurology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 494 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (6 papers) and Brain Metastases and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (145 citations), Cancer Research (95 citations) and Genetics (57 citations). Elizabeth Harford‐Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert Vink, Julie Gavard, M. N. Ghabriel, Nicolas Bidère, Emma Thornton, Lucas Treps, Eva María Galán‐Moya, Damien Ricard, Alain Schmitt and Gwennan André‐Grégoire. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The EMBO Journal and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.