Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Service Innovation in the Digital Age: Key Contributions and Future Directions
2015643 citationsMichael Barrett, Elizabeth Davidson et al.MIS Quarterlyprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Davidson Elizabeth Davidson (= 1×)
peers
Andrew P. McAfee
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Davidson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Davidson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Davidson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Davidson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Davidson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Davidson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Davidson. The network helps show where Elizabeth Davidson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Davidson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Davidson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Davidson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Davidson. Elizabeth Davidson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Young, Amber, Michael Myers, Donal Carbaugh, et al.. (2019). Giving Voice to the Voiceless: The Use of Digital Technologies by Marginalized Groups. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.24 indexed citations
2.
Wessel, Lauri, et al.. (2018). Can Digital Innovation Alter the Landscape of Women™s Entrepreneurship? Towards A Research Agenda. International Conference on Information Systems.3 indexed citations
3.
Abhari, Kaveh, Elizabeth Davidson, & Bo Xiao. (2017). Co-innovation Experience in Social Product Development Networks: Construct Development and Measurement Validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
4.
Winter, Jenifer Sunrise & Elizabeth Davidson. (2017). Investigating Values in Personal Health Data Governance Models. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2017.9 indexed citations
5.
Abhari, Kaveh, Elizabeth Davidson, & Bo Xiao. (2016). Taking Open Innovation to the Next Level: A Conceptual Model of Social Product Development (SPD). Americas Conference on Information Systems.10 indexed citations
Barrett, Michael, Elizabeth Davidson, Anne‐Laure Fayard, Stephen L. Vargo, & Youngjin Yoo. (2012). Being Innovative About Service Innovation: Service, Design and Digitalization. International Conference on Information Systems. 433–438.4 indexed citations
8.
Abraham, Chon, Miki Akiyama, Carol V. Brown, et al.. (2010). Healthcare IT Adoption under Different Government Models: Debating the HITECH Impacts. International Conference on Information Systems. 177.2 indexed citations
9.
Davidson, Elizabeth, et al.. (2009). The A-List vs. the Long Tail: Technology Bloggers and Reputation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 574.1 indexed citations
Barrett, Michael, Elizabeth Davidson, Catherine A. Middleton, & Janice I. DeGross. (2008). Information Technology in the Service Economy: Challenges and Possibilities for the 21st Century IFIP Working Group 8.2 Conference, Toronto, Canada, August ... Federation for Information Processing). Springer eBooks.3 indexed citations
12.
Davidson, Elizabeth, et al.. (2007). Exploring Technology Frames through Interview Narratives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 203.2 indexed citations
13.
Davidson, Elizabeth, et al.. (2007). Do Perceptions of An Organizing Vision Influence Physicians Assimilation of Electronic Medical Records. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 207.2 indexed citations
14.
Chiasson, Mike & Elizabeth Davidson. (2007). Texts as Maps: Deconstruction as an Approach to Exploring IS Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 224.1 indexed citations
Boland, Richard J., Elizabeth Davidson, Suzanne D. Pawlowski, Ulrike Schultze, & Emmanuelle Vaast. (2005). Investigating the "Knowledge" in Knowledge Management: A Social Representations Perspective.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
17.
Davidson, Elizabeth & Roberta Lamb. (2004). Hybrid Organization In High-Tech Enterprise. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 21.7 indexed citations
18.
Davidson, Elizabeth. (2002). Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
19.
Davidson, Elizabeth & William G. Chismar. (1999). Planning and managing computerized order entry: a case study of IT-enabled organizational transformation.. PubMed. 19(4). 47–61.22 indexed citations
20.
Davidson, Elizabeth. (1993). AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF JOINT APPLICATION DESIGN (JAD) IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS DELIVERY. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 271–283.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.