Elizabeth A. Gow
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Bridget J. M. StutchburyKaren L. WiebeJames W. FoxVsevolod AfanasyevJohn TautinScott A. TarofPatrick M. KramerMaggie MacPherson
- Topics
- Avian ecology and behavior (21 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (18 papers)Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth A. Gow
32 papers receiving 866 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Ecology 797
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 346
- Ecological Modeling 236
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 150
- Global and Planetary Change 101
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth A. Gow
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth A. Gow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth A. Gow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth A. Gow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth A. Gow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth A. Gow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth A. Gow. The network helps show where Elizabeth A. Gow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth A. Gow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth A. Gow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth A. Gow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth A. Gow. Elizabeth A. Gow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | Parental care in northern flickers: sex-related patterns of foraging, provisioning, and habitat use | 1 |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 393 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Elizabeth A. Gow
Elizabeth A. Gow is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Parasitology and Ecology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (21 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (18 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (236 citations), Developmental Biology (86 citations) and Ecology (797 citations). Elizabeth A. Gow has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bridget J. M. Stutchbury, Karen L. Wiebe, James W. Fox, Vsevolod Afanasyev, John Tautin, Scott A. Tarof, Patrick M. Kramer, Maggie MacPherson, Mary Johnson and Melissa L. Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.