Elisabeth Knust

10.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
123 papers, 8.2k citations indexed

About

Elisabeth Knust is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Elisabeth Knust has authored 123 papers receiving a total of 8.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Molecular Biology, 77 papers in Cell Biology and 35 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Elisabeth Knust's work include Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (60 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (48 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (31 papers). Elisabeth Knust is often cited by papers focused on Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ (60 papers), Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (48 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (31 papers). Elisabeth Knust collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Elisabeth Knust's co-authors include Andreas Wodarz, Ulrich Tepaß, José A. Campos‐Ortega, Ferdi Grawe, Olaf Bossinger, Uwe Hinz, Ulrich Thomas, Natalia A. Bulgakova, André S. Bachmann and Stephan Speicher and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell.

In The Last Decade

Elisabeth Knust

123 papers receiving 8.1k citations

Hit Papers

Expression of crumbs confers apical character on plasma m... 1990 2026 2002 2014 1995 1990 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Elisabeth Knust Germany 47 6.2k 4.1k 1.8k 842 821 123 8.2k
Lynn Cooley United States 44 5.1k 0.8× 2.6k 0.6× 1.2k 0.7× 853 1.0× 1.1k 1.4× 84 7.5k
Peter J. Bryant United States 49 7.3k 1.2× 4.0k 1.0× 2.5k 1.4× 728 0.9× 1.3k 1.6× 135 10.2k
Ulrich Tepaß Canada 50 6.3k 1.0× 4.9k 1.2× 1.8k 1.0× 467 0.6× 650 0.8× 72 9.0k
Richard G. Fehon United States 35 5.2k 0.8× 3.7k 0.9× 1.6k 0.9× 308 0.4× 522 0.6× 62 8.0k
David Bilder United States 41 4.8k 0.8× 4.0k 1.0× 1.1k 0.6× 373 0.4× 427 0.5× 71 7.3k
Ginés Morata Spain 58 8.8k 1.4× 3.0k 0.7× 2.3k 1.3× 1.4k 1.7× 2.6k 3.2× 116 10.7k
Pernille Rørth Germany 35 4.0k 0.6× 3.0k 0.7× 1.3k 0.7× 447 0.5× 479 0.6× 46 6.2k
Iswar K. Hariharan United States 41 4.7k 0.8× 3.3k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 406 0.5× 499 0.6× 75 7.1k
Bruce A. Hay United States 46 7.5k 1.2× 1.6k 0.4× 1.2k 0.7× 751 0.9× 1.1k 1.3× 87 9.5k
Cecilia B. Moens United States 54 6.9k 1.1× 2.7k 0.7× 1.2k 0.7× 671 0.8× 1.7k 2.1× 118 9.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Knust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Knust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Knust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Knust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Knust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Knust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Knust. The network helps show where Elisabeth Knust may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Knust

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Knust. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Knust based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Knust. Elisabeth Knust is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hartenstein, Volker, et al.. (2019). Serial electron microscopic reconstruction of the drosophila larval eye: Photoreceptors with a rudimentary rhabdomere of microvillar-like processes. Developmental Biology. 453(1). 56–67. 1 indexed citations
2.
Skouloudaki, Kassiani, Dimitrios K. Papadopoulos, Pavel Tomančák, & Elisabeth Knust. (2019). The apical protein Apnoia interacts with Crumbs to regulate tracheal growth and inflation. PLoS Genetics. 15(1). e1007852–e1007852. 10 indexed citations
3.
Pocha, Shirin, et al.. (2015). AP-2-complex-mediated endocytosis of Drosophila Crumbs regulates polarity by antagonizing Stardust. Journal of Cell Science. 128(24). 4538–4549. 34 indexed citations
4.
5.
Soukup, Sandra‐Fausia, et al.. (2013). DLin-7 Is Required in Postsynaptic Lamina Neurons to Prevent Light-Induced Photoreceptor Degeneration in Drosophila. Current Biology. 23(14). 1349–1354. 10 indexed citations
6.
Bulgakova, Natalia A., et al.. (2010). Antagonistic Functions of Two Stardust Isoforms inDrosophilaPhotoreceptor Cells. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 21(22). 3915–3925. 18 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, Kyra, Elisabeth Knust, & Helen Skaer. (2009). Crumbs stabilises epithelial polarity during tissue remodelling. Journal of Cell Science. 122(15). 2604–2612. 62 indexed citations
8.
Richard, Mélisande, et al.. (2009). A role for the extracellular domain of Crumbs in morphogenesis of Drosophila photoreceptor cells. European Journal of Cell Biology. 88(12). 765–777. 34 indexed citations
9.
Knust, Elisabeth & Wieland Β. Huttner. (2007). Cell Polarity from Cell Division. Developmental Cell. 12(5). 664–666. 2 indexed citations
10.
Simões, Sérgio, Sol Sotillos, Kevin M. Johnson, et al.. (2006). Coordinated Control of Cell Adhesion, Polarity, and Cytoskeleton Underlies Hox-Induced Organogenesis in Drosophila. Current Biology. 16(22). 2206–2216. 79 indexed citations
11.
Richard, Mélisande, Ronald Roepman, Wendy M. Aartsen, et al.. (2006). Towards understanding CRUMBS function in retinal dystrophies. Human Molecular Genetics. 15(suppl_2). R235–R243. 107 indexed citations
12.
Sánchez‐Soriano, Natalia, et al.. (2005). Are dendrites in Drosophila homologous to vertebrate dendrites?. Developmental Biology. 288(1). 126–138. 73 indexed citations
13.
Bossinger, Olaf, et al.. (2001). Zonula Adherens Formation in Caenorhabditis elegans Requires dlg-1, the Homologue of the Drosophila Gene discs large. Developmental Biology. 230(1). 29–42. 138 indexed citations
14.
Martı́n-Blanco, Enrique & Elisabeth Knust. (2001). Epithelial morphogenesis: Filopodia at work. Current Biology. 11(1). R28–R31. 25 indexed citations
15.
Klebes, Ansgar & Elisabeth Knust. (2000). A conserved motif in Crumbs is required for E-cadherin localisation and zonula adherens formation in Drosophila. Current Biology. 10(2). 76–85. 173 indexed citations
16.
Knust, Elisabeth. (2000). Control of epithelial cell shape and polarity. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development. 10(5). 471–475. 47 indexed citations
17.
Bachmann, André S. & Elisabeth Knust. (1998). Dissection of cis-regulatory elements of the Drosophila gene Serrate. Development Genes and Evolution. 208(6). 346–351. 46 indexed citations
18.
Knust, Elisabeth. (1997). Drosophila morphogenesis: Movements behind the edge. Current Biology. 7(9). R558–R561. 34 indexed citations
19.
Couso, Juan Pablo, Elisabeth Knust, & Alfonso Martínez Arias. (1995). Serrate and wingless cooperate to induce vestigial gene expression and wing formation in Drosophila. Current Biology. 5(12). 1437–1448. 181 indexed citations
20.
Knust, Elisabeth, et al.. (1982). 有機化合物の 18 F標識のための水をターゲットとした 18 Fの高収率製造法 6-( 18 F)-ニコチン酸ジエチルアミドの合成. Journal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals. 19. 1643–1644. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026