Elisabeth Gillespie

36 total papers · 707 total citations
10 papers, 136 citations indexed

About

Elisabeth Gillespie is a scholar working on Hematology, Molecular Biology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elisabeth Gillespie has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 136 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Hematology, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Elisabeth Gillespie's work include Blood groups and transfusion (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). Elisabeth Gillespie is often cited by papers focused on Blood groups and transfusion (4 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (3 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers). Elisabeth Gillespie collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Nigeria. Elisabeth Gillespie's co-authors include E. R. Gold, G. H. Tovey, William J. Weiner, Hannah B Lewis, Yoseph Barash, Timos Valaes, T.E. Oppé, Matthew R. Gazzara, Asen Bagashev and Jean Boyer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nucleic Acids Research and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Elisabeth Gillespie

9 papers receiving 132 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Elisabeth Gillespie 59 38 32 24 24 10 136
Natalie Ertz-Archambault 57 1.0× 42 1.1× 18 0.6× 45 1.9× 10 0.4× 13 144
Carolina Elosua 121 2.1× 20 0.5× 18 0.6× 34 1.4× 22 0.9× 7 229
Tomoharu Takeoka 83 1.4× 30 0.8× 35 1.1× 27 1.1× 28 1.2× 14 185
Nils B. Leimkühler 40 0.7× 40 1.1× 33 1.0× 21 0.9× 18 0.8× 7 111
Hamish Houston 124 2.1× 17 0.4× 52 1.6× 32 1.3× 30 1.3× 13 264
Aishath Naeem 97 1.6× 22 0.6× 50 1.6× 20 0.8× 28 1.2× 10 231
Adrienne M. Dorrance 105 1.8× 82 2.2× 74 2.3× 24 1.0× 52 2.2× 10 228
Laura García-Pérez 133 2.3× 37 1.0× 64 2.0× 49 2.0× 15 0.6× 12 229
Marie Thérèse Daniel 45 0.8× 69 1.8× 21 0.7× 11 0.5× 22 0.9× 10 145
Chiara Pirillo 48 0.8× 27 0.7× 44 1.4× 27 1.1× 19 0.8× 10 130

Countries citing papers authored by Elisabeth Gillespie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elisabeth Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elisabeth Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elisabeth Gillespie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elisabeth Gillespie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elisabeth Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elisabeth Gillespie. The network helps show where Elisabeth Gillespie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elisabeth Gillespie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elisabeth Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elisabeth Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elisabeth Gillespie. Elisabeth Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026