Eliot Kapit

1.9k citations
34 papers · 965 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Eliot Kapit

34 papers receiving 950 citations

Peers

Eliot Kapit
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Condensed Matter Physics 272
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 666
  • Virology 44
  • Artificial Intelligence 272
  • Computational Mechanics 132
Replace Felipe Barra with:
Felipe Barra Chile
Anand U. Oza United States
Valerii Vinokur United States
Go Fujii Japan
Pascal Chauve France
V. Grimalsky Mexico
Maxim Goryachev Australia
Ke-Xun Sun United States
D. V. Karlovets Russia
Vladimir Shiltsev United States
Eliot Kapit relative to Felipe Barra Chile Felipe Barra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Felipe Barra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eliot Kapit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eliot Kapit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eliot Kapit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eliot Kapit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eliot Kapit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eliot Kapit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eliot Kapit. The network helps show where Eliot Kapit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eliot Kapit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eliot Kapit Line = papers co-authored together Eliot Kapit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009163
2 2007125
3 2010119
4 201787
5 200961
6 201151
7 200647
8 201939
9 201237
10 201334
11 201530
12 201824
13 202323
14 201322
15 201518
16 201312
17 201810
18 20229
19 20249
20 20178

About Eliot Kapit

Eliot Kapit is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum and electron transport phenomena (20 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (18 papers), Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture (15 papers), Quantum many-body systems (6 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (5 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (4 papers) and Quantum-Dot Cellular Automata (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (272 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (666 citations), Virology (44 citations), Artificial Intelligence (272 citations) and Computational Mechanics (132 citations). Eliot Kapit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Erich J. Mueller, Ronny Thomale, Darrell F. Schroeter, Martin Greiter, Scott Waitukaitis, Heinrich M. Jaeger, Loreto Oyarte Gálvez, J Royer, Matthias E. Möbius and Steven H. Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A, Physical Review B, Quantum Science and Technology and Physical review. A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact