Eli Keshavarz‐Moore

2.1k total citations
82 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Eli Keshavarz‐Moore is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Eli Keshavarz‐Moore has authored 82 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Molecular Biology, 19 papers in Genetics and 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Eli Keshavarz‐Moore's work include Protein purification and stability (30 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (24 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (16 papers). Eli Keshavarz‐Moore is often cited by papers focused on Protein purification and stability (30 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (24 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (16 papers). Eli Keshavarz‐Moore collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Australia. Eli Keshavarz‐Moore's co-authors include John M. Ward, P. Ayazi Shamlou, Steven Branston, P. Dunnill, Ronan O’Kennedy, Colin Robinson, M. D. Lilly, Hu Zhang, Pamela A. Williams and Cristina F.R.O. Matos and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Nature Protocols and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Eli Keshavarz‐Moore

79 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eli Keshavarz‐Moore United Kingdom 25 1.1k 352 315 288 247 82 1.6k
Susanne Wilhelm Germany 24 1.6k 1.5× 265 0.8× 477 1.5× 319 1.1× 93 0.4× 41 2.1k
Yoshio Katakura Japan 25 1.5k 1.4× 571 1.6× 213 0.7× 109 0.4× 182 0.7× 87 2.1k
Karl Friehs Germany 26 1.4k 1.3× 394 1.1× 360 1.1× 189 0.7× 95 0.4× 78 1.8k
Kim Kusk Mortensen Denmark 21 2.1k 2.0× 221 0.6× 676 2.1× 331 1.1× 248 1.0× 42 2.7k
Danielle Tullman‐Ercek United States 27 1.7k 1.6× 451 1.3× 591 1.9× 643 2.2× 134 0.5× 66 2.4k
Laura A. Palomares Mexico 26 1.3k 1.2× 420 1.2× 299 0.9× 171 0.6× 129 0.5× 79 2.1k
Shinji Iijima Japan 27 1.8k 1.7× 529 1.5× 730 2.3× 128 0.4× 173 0.7× 171 2.6k
Jeffrey D. Fox United States 10 1.1k 1.0× 123 0.3× 193 0.6× 126 0.4× 153 0.6× 10 1.7k
Sarah W. Harcum United States 19 1.3k 1.2× 180 0.5× 494 1.6× 151 0.5× 197 0.8× 58 1.5k
Shimyn Slomovic Israel 15 1.6k 1.5× 461 1.3× 203 0.6× 165 0.6× 73 0.3× 18 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Eli Keshavarz‐Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eli Keshavarz‐Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eli Keshavarz‐Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eli Keshavarz‐Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eli Keshavarz‐Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eli Keshavarz‐Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eli Keshavarz‐Moore. The network helps show where Eli Keshavarz‐Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eli Keshavarz‐Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eli Keshavarz‐Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eli Keshavarz‐Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eli Keshavarz‐Moore. Eli Keshavarz‐Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Morris, Stephen, et al.. (2025). Defining a Simplified Process in Yeast for Production of Enveloped VLP Dengue Vaccine. Bioengineering. 12(9). 956–956.
2.
Santis, Emiliana De, et al.. (2022). Quality assessment of virus-like particle: A new transmission electron microscopy approach. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences. 9. 975054–975054. 10 indexed citations
3.
O’Kennedy, Ronan, et al.. (2019). The role of amino acids in the amplification and quality of DNA vectors for industrial applications. Biotechnology Progress. 35(6). e2883–e2883. 4 indexed citations
4.
5.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (2016). Application of Magnetic Field for Improvement of Microbial Productivity. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8 indexed citations
6.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (2016). Influence of Pichia pastoris cellular material on polymerase chain reaction performance as a synthetic biology standard for genome monitoring. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 127. 111–122. 3 indexed citations
7.
Moran, Michael, Trevor Cook, Richard W. Jones, et al.. (2012). Emerging biotechnologies: technology, choice and the public good, a guide to the report. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 61 indexed citations
8.
Chain, Benny, et al.. (2012). Role of DNA topology in uptake of polyplex molecules by dendritic cells. Vaccine. 30(9). 1675–1681. 10 indexed citations
9.
O’Kennedy, Ronan, et al.. (2010). A study of D‐lactate and extracellular methylglyoxal production in lactate Re‐Utilizing CHO cultures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 107(1). 182–189. 8 indexed citations
10.
Hassan, Sally, et al.. (2008). Considerations for extraction of monoclonal antibodies targeted to different subcellular compartments in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal. 6(7). 733–748. 52 indexed citations
11.
Francis, Royce A., et al.. (2007). Decision-Support Software for the Industrial-Scale Chromatographic Purification of Antibodies. Biotechnology Progress. 23(4). 888–894. 4 indexed citations
12.
Lewis, William C., et al.. (2006). Construction and evaluation of novel fusion proteins for targeted delivery of micro particles to cellulose surfaces. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 94(4). 625–632. 15 indexed citations
13.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (2005). CFD analysis of mixing and gas-liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. UCL Discovery (University College London). 5 indexed citations
14.
Zhang, Hu, et al.. (2004). Computational‐fluid‐dynamics (CFD) analysis of mixing and gas–liquid mass transfer in shake flasks. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 41(1). 1–8. 91 indexed citations
15.
O’Kennedy, Ronan, et al.. (2003). Impact of plasmid size on cellular oxygen demand in Escherichia coli. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 38(1). 1–7. 16 indexed citations
16.
O’Kennedy, Ronan, et al.. (1999). Rapid quantitation and monitoring of plasmid DNA using an ultrasensitive DNA-binding dye. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 66(3). 195–201. 23 indexed citations
17.
Turner, Claire, et al.. (1997). Factors determining more efficient large-scale release of a periplasmic enzyme from E. coli using lysozyme. Journal of Biotechnology. 58(1). 1–11. 27 indexed citations
18.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (1995). Microbial population balancing as a quantitative aid for evaluating release from a high pressure homogeniser. UCL Discovery (University College London).
19.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (1995). Microbial population balancing as a quantitative aid for evaluating release from a high pressure homogenizer. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 73(3). 182–188. 1 indexed citations
20.
Keshavarz‐Moore, Eli, et al.. (1995). Rheologies and morphologies of three actinomycetes in submerged culture. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 45(1). 80–85. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026