Eli Gjørven
About
In The Last Decade
Eli Gjørven
7 papers receiving 238 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Artificial Intelligence 203
- Information Systems 178
- Computer Networks and Communications 156
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 58
- Software 24
Countries citing papers authored by Eli Gjørven
This map shows the geographic impact of Eli Gjørven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eli Gjørven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eli Gjørven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eli Gjørven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eli Gjørven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eli Gjørven. The network helps show where Eli Gjørven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eli Gjørven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eli Gjørven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eli Gjørven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eli Gjørven. Eli Gjørven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | Towards NNEC - breaking the interaction barrier with collaboration services | 1 |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 180 | |
| 7 | 9 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.