Elham Paknia
About
In The Last Decade
Elham Paknia
5 papers receiving 676 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Molecular Biology 436
- Structural Biology 261
- Materials Chemistry 151
- Surfaces, Coatings and Films 113
- Genetics 67
Countries citing papers authored by Elham Paknia
This map shows the geographic impact of Elham Paknia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elham Paknia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elham Paknia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elham Paknia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elham Paknia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elham Paknia. The network helps show where Elham Paknia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elham Paknia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elham Paknia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elham Paknia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elham Paknia. Elham Paknia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Atomic-resolution protein structure determination by cryo-EM breakdown → | 485 |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 72 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 73 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.