Elena Smets
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Applied Psychology
- Co-authors
- Chris Van HoofW. De RaedtIlse Van DiestGiuseppina SchiavoneEmmanuel Rios VelazquezLeon E. GovaertOlivier JanssensSofie Van Hoecke
- Topics
- Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers)Emotion and Mood Recognition (2 papers)Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyApplied PsychologyCardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Journals
- Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineIEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informaticsnpj Digital Medicine
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsAustria
In The Last Decade
Elena Smets
8 papers receiving 307 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 147
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 113
- Biomedical Engineering 83
- Cognitive Neuroscience 68
- Applied Psychology 36
Countries citing papers authored by Elena Smets
This map shows the geographic impact of Elena Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elena Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elena Smets more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elena Smets
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elena Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elena Smets. The network helps show where Elena Smets may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elena Smets
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elena Smets. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elena Smets based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elena Smets. Elena Smets is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 128 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | Interindividual differences in inhibitory control predict extinction of interoceptive fear | 1 |
| 9 | 32 |
About Elena Smets
Elena Smets is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (4 papers), Emotion and Mood Recognition (2 papers) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (113 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (147 citations). Elena Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Chris Van Hoof, W. De Raedt, Ilse Van Diest, Giuseppina Schiavone, Emmanuel Rios Velazquez, Leon E. Govaert, Olivier Janssens, Sofie Van Hoecke, Jan Cornelis and Ton Peijs. Their work appears in journals such as Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics and npj Digital Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.