E.K. Piper

891 total citations
24 papers, 601 citations indexed

About

E.K. Piper is a scholar working on Parasitology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, E.K. Piper has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 601 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Parasitology, 12 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 5 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in E.K. Piper's work include Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (12 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers). E.K. Piper is often cited by papers focused on Vector-borne infectious diseases (12 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (12 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (4 papers). E.K. Piper collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Austria. E.K. Piper's co-authors include N.N. Jonsson, Louise A. Jackson, Ala E. Tabor, Constantin Constantinoiu, Cedric Gondro, Paula Moolhuijzen, Sean W. Corley, Neil H. Bagnall, Ala E. Lew and Helle Bielefeldt‐Ohmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Frontiers in Immunology.

In The Last Decade

E.K. Piper

23 papers receiving 589 citations

Peers

E.K. Piper
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Parasitology 368
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 242
  • Insect Science 161
  • Infectious Diseases 128
  • Genetics 117
Replace David Berthier with:
David Berthier France
Neil H. Bagnall Australia
Roberto Rasero Italy
Oscar Boué Cuba
Alison Burrells United Kingdom
Amanda Fonseca Zangirólamo Brazil
J.F. Huntley United Kingdom
D.M. Mwamachi Kenya
Isabelle Chantal France
Bernard Couvreur Belgium
David Berthier France View profile →
Citations per field, relative to E.K. Piper
E.K. Piper · 1×
Citations per year, relative to E.K. Piper
E.K. Piper · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by E.K. Piper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.K. Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.K. Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.K. Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.K. Piper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.K. Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.K. Piper. The network helps show where E.K. Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.K. Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.K. Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.K. Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E.K. Piper. E.K. Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 5
3 8
4 9
5 18
6
Determining the number of animals required to accurately determine breed composition using genomic data
3
7 21
8 31
9 25
10 59
11 8
12 15
13 24
14 48
15 2
16 68
17 88
18 17
19 61
20 5

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026