Eileen A. Lacey

4.1k total citations
104 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Eileen A. Lacey is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Eileen A. Lacey has authored 104 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Ecology, 51 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 27 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Eileen A. Lacey's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (42 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (41 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (34 papers). Eileen A. Lacey is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (42 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (41 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (34 papers). Eileen A. Lacey collaborates with scholars based in United States, Argentina and Uruguay. Eileen A. Lacey's co-authors include John Wieczorek, Paul W. Sherman, A Cutrera, H. Kern Reeve, Laurent Keller, Annaliese K. Beery, Cristina Busch, Darlene Francis, Stan Braude and Roxana R. Zenuto and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Eileen A. Lacey

102 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eileen A. Lacey United States 28 1.3k 1.2k 658 624 406 104 2.6k
Daniel Frynta Czechia 35 900 0.7× 1.1k 0.9× 792 1.2× 1000 1.6× 197 0.5× 174 3.6k
Dietmar Zinner Germany 34 1.2k 0.9× 1.4k 1.2× 627 1.0× 2.2k 3.6× 362 0.9× 135 3.5k
M. Justin O’Riain South Africa 36 2.6k 2.0× 1.9k 1.6× 1.0k 1.6× 1.2k 1.9× 523 1.3× 150 4.7k
Neville Pillay South Africa 28 1.7k 1.3× 1.9k 1.5× 439 0.7× 1.1k 1.7× 149 0.4× 191 3.3k
James M. Dietz United States 30 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 512 0.8× 1.3k 2.1× 94 0.2× 72 3.0k
Timothy F. Wright United States 31 1.4k 1.0× 1.7k 1.4× 669 1.0× 294 0.5× 129 0.3× 87 3.1k
Jason M. Kamilar United States 26 662 0.5× 817 0.7× 187 0.3× 905 1.5× 343 0.8× 67 1.8k
Dominique Allainé France 32 1.8k 1.4× 1.4k 1.2× 644 1.0× 494 0.8× 72 0.2× 65 2.8k
Joyce H. Poole Kenya 25 1.7k 1.3× 1.0k 0.8× 646 1.0× 875 1.4× 152 0.4× 47 2.9k
Dustin R. Rubenstein United States 35 2.6k 2.0× 2.7k 2.2× 1.3k 1.9× 565 0.9× 166 0.4× 113 5.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Eileen A. Lacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eileen A. Lacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eileen A. Lacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eileen A. Lacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eileen A. Lacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eileen A. Lacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eileen A. Lacey. The network helps show where Eileen A. Lacey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eileen A. Lacey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eileen A. Lacey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eileen A. Lacey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eileen A. Lacey. Eileen A. Lacey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2025). Do differences in exploration and boldness inform species level responses to environmental change in montane chipmunks?. Animal Behaviour. 224. 123159–123159. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2024). Group living in highland tuco-tucos (Ctenomys opimus) persists despite a catastrophic decline in population density. PLoS ONE. 19(6). e0304763–e0304763. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2024). Space use and social networks: correlated but not congruent in California ground squirrels. Animal Behaviour. 217. 39–51. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2024). Solitary behavior at high population density in tuco-tucos (Ctenomys sp.) from Parque Nacional Los Cardones, Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy. 105(5). 1117–1129.
5.
Oshima, Júlia Emi de Faria, et al.. (2023). Spatial and social organization of the burrowing rodent Clyomys laticeps (Thomas, 1909). Journal of Mammalogy. 104(3). 591–602.
6.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2023). Monogamy or monogamish? Re-examining monogamy in Peromyscus californicus. Therya. 14(2). 207–214. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2022). A century of stasis: Taxonomy of Ctenomys (Rodentia: Hystricomorpha) populations in northeastern Patagonia limits, Argentina. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 298. 136–147. 8 indexed citations
8.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2022). Variable social organization among tuco-tucos (genusCtenomys) in theopimusclade. Journal of Mammalogy. 103(4). 979–992. 7 indexed citations
9.
Valentinuzzi, Verónica S., et al.. (2021). Dynamic spatial overlap in a solitary subterranean rodent: the Anillaco tuco-tuco (Ctenomys sp.). Journal of Mammalogy. 102(3). 826–836. 9 indexed citations
11.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2020). Facultative sociality in a subterranean rodent, the highland tuco-tuco (Ctenomys opimus). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 129(4). 918–930. 10 indexed citations
12.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2020). Dramatic recent changes in small mammal assemblages from Northern Patagonia: A caution for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. The Holocene. 30(11). 1579–1590. 12 indexed citations
13.
Lacey, Eileen A., et al.. (2019). Ecological and demographic impacts of a recent volcanic eruption on two endemic patagonian rodents. PLoS ONE. 14(3). e0213311–e0213311. 8 indexed citations
14.
Pardiñas, Ulyses F. J., et al.. (2018). Identifying drivers of historical genetic decline in an endemic Patagonian rodent, the colonial tuco-tuco, Ctenomys sociabilis (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 10 indexed citations
15.
Cicero, Carla, et al.. (2017). Mutualism in museums: A model for engaging undergraduates in biodiversity science. PLoS Biology. 15(11). e2003318–e2003318. 20 indexed citations
16.
Pardiñas, Ulyses F. J., et al.. (2017). Contrasting patterns of Holocene genetic variation in two parapatric species of Ctenomys from Northern Patagonia, Argentina. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 123(1). 96–112. 8 indexed citations
17.
Estevan, Ignacio, Eileen A. Lacey, & Bettina Tassino. (2016). DAILY PATTERNS OF ACTIVITY IN FREE-LIVING RIO NEGRO TUCO-TUCOS (Ctenomys rionegrensis). Mastozoología neotropical. 23(1). 71–80. 3 indexed citations
18.
Lacey, Eileen A. & Philip C. Myers. (2005). Mammalian Diversification: From Chromosomes to Phylogeography (A Celebration of the Career of James L. Patton). eScholarship (California Digital Library). 24(12). 144–144. 42 indexed citations
19.
Lacey, Eileen A. & John Wieczorek. (2003). Oliver Pearson (1915-2003). Mastozoología neotropical. 10(1). 195–205. 1 indexed citations
20.
Lacey, Eileen A.. (1991). Reproductive and dispersal strategies of male arctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus parryii plesius).. Deep Blue (University of Michigan). 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026