Eila Repo‐Tiihonen

2.8k citations
61 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 24

Eila Repo‐Tiihonen

60 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Clinical Psychology 1.0k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 483
  • Biological Psychiatry 58
  • Social Psychology 252
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 220
Replace Janice M. McKenzie with:
Janice M. McKenzie New Zealand
Pirjo Saarinen Finland
K S Kendler United States
J. Spauwen Germany
J Guelfi France
George Konstantakopoulos Greece
Hans-Joergen Grabe Germany
Henning Saß Germany
Michael Osterheider Germany
Miguel Ruíz-Veguilla Spain
Eila Repo‐Tiihonen relative to Janice M. McKenzie New Zealand Janice M. McKenzie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Janice M. McKenzie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eila Repo‐Tiihonen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eila Repo‐Tiihonen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. The network helps show where Eila Repo‐Tiihonen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eila Repo‐Tiihonen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eila Repo‐Tiihonen Line = papers co-authored together Eila Repo‐Tiihonen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20208
2 201923
3 20179
4 201635
5 20164
6
Metacognitive group training for forensic and dangerous non-forensic patients with schizophrenia: A randomised controlled feasibility trial
20151
7 20154
8 201328
9 20131
10 201116
11 201195
12 201113
13 201023
14 201040
15 200949
16 200949
17 200929
18 2008129
19 200750
20 200244

About Eila Repo‐Tiihonen

Eila Repo‐Tiihonen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (33 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (26 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (18 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (6 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (483 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (58 citations). Eila Repo‐Tiihonen has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jari Tiihonen, Olli Vaurio, Olli‐Pekka Ryynänen, Matti Virkkunen, Anu Putkonen, Mikko P. Laakso, Markku Eronen, Olavi Louheranta, Hilkka Soininen and Hannu J. Aronen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026