Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jari TiihonenOlli VaurioOlli‐Pekka RyynänenMatti VirkkunenAnu PutkonenMikko P. LaaksoMarkku EronenOlavi Louheranta
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (33 papers)Schizophrenia research and treatment (26 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (18 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBiological PsychiatryThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- FinlandSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
60 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 483
- Sociology and Political Science 258
- Social Psychology 252
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 220
Countries citing papers authored by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
This map shows the geographic impact of Eila Repo‐Tiihonen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eila Repo‐Tiihonen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. The network helps show where Eila Repo‐Tiihonen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eila Repo‐Tiihonen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eila Repo‐Tiihonen. Eila Repo‐Tiihonen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Metacognitive group training for forensic and dangerous non-forensic patients with schizophrenia: A randomised controlled feasibility trial | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 95 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 49 | |
| 17 | 29 | |
| 18 | 129 | |
| 19 | 50 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Eila Repo‐Tiihonen
Eila Repo‐Tiihonen is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (33 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (26 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (483 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (58 citations). Eila Repo‐Tiihonen has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jari Tiihonen, Olli Vaurio, Olli‐Pekka Ryynänen, Matti Virkkunen, Anu Putkonen, Mikko P. Laakso, Markku Eronen, Olavi Louheranta, Hilkka Soininen and Hannu J. Aronen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Biological Psychiatry and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.