Egbert Dierker

1.1k citations
32 papers · 482 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Egbert Dierker

29 papers receiving 405 citations

Peers

Egbert Dierker
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 215
  • Economics and Econometrics 420
  • General Decision Sciences 20
  • Management Science and Operations Research 78
  • Geometry and Topology 25
Replace Dieter Sondermann with:
Dieter Sondermann Germany
Takashi Kamihigashi Japan
Jean‐Marc Bonnisseau France
Trout Rader United States
Benyamin Shitovitz Israel
Beth Allen United States
Monique Florenzano France
Wayne Shafer United States
Paolo Guasoni United States
Konrad Podczeck Austria
Egbert Dierker relative to Dieter Sondermann Germany Dieter Sondermann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Dieter Sondermann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Egbert Dierker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Egbert Dierker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Egbert Dierker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Egbert Dierker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Egbert Dierker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Egbert Dierker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Egbert Dierker. The network helps show where Egbert Dierker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Egbert Dierker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Egbert Dierker Line = papers co-authored together Egbert Dierker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197297
2 197489
3 197137
4
Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums
199835
5 198534
6 197225
7 197516
8 199616
9 198615
10 200214
11 199114
12 199810
13 20069
14 19848
15
Surplus maximization and Pareto optimality
19868
16 19907
17 20046
18 19806
19 19766
20 20115

About Egbert Dierker

Egbert Dierker is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (25 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (13 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (11 papers), Game Theory and Voting Systems (4 papers), Game Theory and Applications (4 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (2 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (215 citations), Economics and Econometrics (420 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (78 citations) and Geometry and Topology (25 citations). Egbert Dierker has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Denmark and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Birgit Grodal, Roger Guesnerie, Karl Sigmund, Karl Menger, John W Dawson, Walter Trockel and Hans Haller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Economics, Econometrica, Economic Theory, Journal of Economics and Journal of Economic Theory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact