E.E. Sutter

913 total citations
20 papers, 738 citations indexed

About

E.E. Sutter is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, E.E. Sutter has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 738 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in E.E. Sutter's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers). E.E. Sutter is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers). E.E. Sutter collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Netherlands. E.E. Sutter's co-authors include Heidi A. Baseler, Stanley A. Klein, Thom Carney, Wayne E. Fung, Marcus A. Bearse, Anja Palmowski-Wolfe, Anthony M. Norcia, Mutsukazu Kitano, Takuji Kasamatsu and Charlotte M. Poloschek and has published in prestigious journals such as Experimental Brain Research, Vision Research and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

E.E. Sutter

19 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
E.E. Sutter United States	9	380	367	313	163	137	20	738
Michael E. Breton United States	16	360 0.9×	197 0.5×	335 1.1×	210 1.3×	137 1.0×	35	772
Robert O. Duncan United States	9	147 0.4×	473 1.3×	185 0.6×	68 0.4×	112 0.8×	15	678
T. Fitzgibbon Australia	16	189 0.5×	174 0.5×	173 0.6×	230 1.4×	66 0.5×	26	504
N. Drasdo United Kingdom	16	373 1.0×	546 1.5×	431 1.4×	193 1.2×	202 1.5×	37	1.0k
Matthias Korth Germany	20	553 1.5×	367 1.0×	754 2.4×	181 1.1×	270 2.0×	76	1.1k
Phyllis Bobak United States	12	282 0.7×	313 0.9×	171 0.5×	130 0.8×	54 0.4×	17	618
William R. Biersdorf United States	17	257 0.7×	334 0.9×	176 0.6×	168 1.0×	51 0.4×	37	620
Davina R. Hocking United States	9	264 0.7×	440 1.2×	143 0.5×	174 1.1×	37 0.3×	9	569
Maria Kolic Australia	13	116 0.3×	117 0.3×	233 0.7×	87 0.5×	129 0.9×	40	368
Tiande Shou China	14	247 0.7×	330 0.9×	172 0.5×	249 1.5×	62 0.5×	27	583

Countries citing papers authored by E.E. Sutter

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.E. Sutter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.E. Sutter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.E. Sutter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.E. Sutter

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.E. Sutter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.E. Sutter. The network helps show where E.E. Sutter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of E.E. Sutter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E.E. Sutter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E.E. Sutter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E.E. Sutter. E.E. Sutter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2024). The role of self-reported and physiological stress in nocebo hyperalgesia. Biological Psychology. 190. 108818–108818. 1 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2017). Low to moderate relationships between gait and postural responses in Parkinson disease. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. 49(6). 505–511. 9 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2006). Focal Variability of the Optic Nerve Head Component of Multifocal ERG Responses in Unaffected Carriers of 11778 LHON Suggests Retrobulbar Myelin Remodeling. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 47(13). 4838–4838. 1 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2004). Fast Adaptive Mechanisms in the Retina Revealed with the Multifocal ERG. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 4228–4228. 2 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2004). Abnormal multifocal ERG and VEP responses in carriers of 11778 LHON. 45(13). 1015–1015. 1 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2003). The Effect of Fixation Instability on the Multifocal ERG. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 44(13). 2699–2699. 2 indexed citations

Sutter, E.E.. (2002). Effects Of Feed Forward And Feedback Mechanisms In The Human Retina Revealed By The Multifocal Erg. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 1797–1797. 1 indexed citations

Poloschek, Charlotte M. & E.E. Sutter. (2002). The fine structure of multifocal ERG topographies. Journal of Vision. 2(8). 5–5. 17 indexed citations

Gerth‐Kahlert, Christina, E.E. Sutter, & J. S. Werner. (2002). The Impulse Response of the Aging Retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 1772–1772. 1 indexed citations

10.

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2002). Direct Contribution of Activity in Rod Photoreceptors to the Multifocal Electroretinogram Response in Frog Retina. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 1820–1820. 1 indexed citations

11.

Sutter, E.E., et al.. (2002). The Effect Of Fixation Error On The Multifocal VEP. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 43(13). 4740–4740. 3 indexed citations

12.

Jurklies, Bernhard, et al.. (2002). Monitoring retinal function in neovascular maculopathy using multifocal electroretinography – early and long-term correlation with clinical findings. Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 240(4). 244–264. 33 indexed citations

13.

Kasamatsu, Takuji, Mutsukazu Kitano, E.E. Sutter, & Anthony M. Norcia. (1998). Lack of lateral inhibitory interactions in visual cortex of monocularly deprived cats. Vision Research. 38(1). 1–12. 16 indexed citations

14.

Baseler, Heidi A. & E.E. Sutter. (1997). M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution. Vision Research. 37(6). 675–690. 147 indexed citations

15.

Palmowski-Wolfe, Anja, E.E. Sutter, Marcus A. Bearse, & Wayne E. Fung. (1997). Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multifocal electroretinogram.. PubMed. 38(12). 2586–96. 173 indexed citations

16.

Kitano, Mutsukazu, Takuji Kasamatsu, Anthony M. Norcia, & E.E. Sutter. (1995). Spatially distributed responses induced by contrast reversal in cat visual cortex. Experimental Brain Research. 104(2). 297–309. 13 indexed citations

17.

Kitano, Mutsukazu, et al.. (1994). Retinotopic and nonretinotopic field potentials in cat visual cortex. Visual Neuroscience. 11(5). 953–977. 37 indexed citations

18.

Baseler, Heidi A., E.E. Sutter, Stanley A. Klein, & Thom Carney. (1994). The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 90(1). 65–81. 274 indexed citations

19.

Cogan, Alexander I., et al.. (1991). Stereopsis and the interocular sign of brightness contrast. Optical Society of America Annual Meeting. FM3–FM3. 1 indexed citations

20.

Sutter, E.E. & W Meier-Ruge. (1965). Sandwich Embedding of Eyeball Wall for Optimal Paraffin Sections of Retina. Stain Technology. 40(1). 19–21. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact