Edwina Smith

810 total citations
9 papers, 593 citations indexed

About

Edwina Smith is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Edwina Smith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 593 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 2 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Edwina Smith's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). Edwina Smith is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (2 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers). Edwina Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Edwina Smith's co-authors include Ahmed Elkashef, Roberta Kahn, Shou-Hua Li, Tyson H. Holmes, Nora Chiang, Frank J. Vocci, A. Anderson, D. Blöch, Nassima Ait‐Daoud and Bankole A. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Neurology, Neuropsychopharmacology and Addiction.

In The Last Decade

Edwina Smith

8 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edwina Smith United States 6 330 125 124 113 97 9 593
Helenna Nakama United States 10 153 0.5× 44 0.4× 89 0.7× 68 0.6× 89 0.9× 13 622
Ryan P. Bell United States 15 226 0.7× 81 0.6× 42 0.3× 96 0.8× 53 0.5× 38 705
Alicia Brockington United States 7 464 1.4× 221 1.8× 84 0.7× 141 1.2× 71 0.7× 9 865
Anita Hole United States 9 242 0.7× 97 0.8× 51 0.4× 46 0.4× 100 1.0× 10 622
Sonsoles Martı́n Spain 15 364 1.1× 120 1.0× 198 1.6× 20 0.2× 61 0.6× 16 602
Christina von Mayrhauser United States 4 162 0.5× 48 0.4× 110 0.9× 51 0.5× 248 2.6× 4 468
Kishor Gonsai United States 9 274 0.8× 125 1.0× 163 1.3× 94 0.8× 191 2.0× 9 542
Sara R. Nass United States 11 156 0.5× 68 0.5× 286 2.3× 19 0.2× 19 0.2× 24 491
Michael J. Taylor United States 10 110 0.3× 75 0.6× 23 0.2× 113 1.0× 57 0.6× 16 582
Matthew Butler United Kingdom 14 181 0.5× 220 1.8× 54 0.4× 133 1.2× 58 0.6× 40 769

Countries citing papers authored by Edwina Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwina Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwina Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwina Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwina Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwina Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwina Smith. The network helps show where Edwina Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwina Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwina Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwina Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwina Smith. Edwina Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Porter‐Stransky, Kirsten A., et al.. (2022). How Medical Students Apply Their Biomedical Science Knowledge to Patient Care in the Family Medicine Clerkship. Medical Science Educator. 33(1). 63–72. 3 indexed citations
2.
Sacktor, Ned, Sachiko Miyahara, Lijuan Deng, et al.. (2011). Minocycline treatment for HIV-associated cognitive impairment. Neurology. 77(12). 1135–1142. 67 indexed citations
3.
Anderson, A., Malcolm S. Reid, Tyson H. Holmes, et al.. (2009). Modafinil for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 104(1-2). 133–139. 175 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Bankole A., Nassima Ait‐Daoud, Ahmed Elkashef, et al.. (2007). A preliminary randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ondansetron in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology. 11(1). 1–14. 104 indexed citations
5.
Elkashef, Ahmed, Richard A. Rawson, Edwina Smith, et al.. (2007). The NIDA Methamphetamine Clinical Trials Group: a strategy to increase clinical trials research capacity. Addiction. 102(s1). 107–113. 11 indexed citations
6.
Elkashef, Ahmed, Richard A. Rawson, A. Anderson, et al.. (2007). Bupropion for the Treatment of Methamphetamine Dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology. 33(5). 1162–1170. 169 indexed citations
7.
Schifitto, Giovanni, Scott Evans, Ned Sacktor, et al.. (2007). A multicenter trial of selegiline transdermal system for HIV-associated cognitive impairment. Neurology. 69(13). 1314–1321. 61 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Edwina, et al.. (1998). The Flute Book, A Complete Guide for Students and Performers. The Galpin Society Journal. 51. 234–234. 2 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Edwina, et al.. (1988). Concerning the Flute. The Galpin Society Journal. 41. 130–130. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026