Edwin O. Willis

2.6k citations
91 papers · 2.1k · h-index 22

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin O. Willis

83 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Edwin O. Willis
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ecological Modeling 379
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.0k
  • Developmental Biology 126
  • Ecology 1.4k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 982
Replace G. L. Maclean with:
G. L. Maclean South Africa
Debra K. Moskovits United States
Jean‐Marc Thiollay France
R. E. Moreau United States
Timothy C. Moermond United States
Volker Salewski Germany
Ilpo K. Hanski Finland
Steve Zack United States
Dewi M. Prawiradilaga Indonesia
Timothy M. Crowe South Africa
Edwin O. Willis relative to G. L. Maclean South Africa G. L. Maclean's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
G. L. Maclean · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin O. Willis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin O. Willis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin O. Willis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin O. Willis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin O. Willis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin O. Willis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin O. Willis. The network helps show where Edwin O. Willis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Edwin O. Willis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin O. Willis Line = papers co-authored together Edwin O. Willis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979338
2 1974307
3 1978203
4 1967123
5 197284
6 197957
7 196652
8 199742
9 196937
10 197336
11 196636
12 196136
13 197232
14 198429
15 196827
16 197827
17 199226
18 200226
19 197225
20 196022

About Edwin O. Willis

Edwin O. Willis is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 91 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Avian ecology and behavior (38 papers), Plant and animal studies (21 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (17 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Fish biology, ecology, and behavior (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (10 papers) and Environmental and biological studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (379 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k citations), Developmental Biology (126 citations), Ecology (1.4k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (982 citations). Edwin O. Willis has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Yoshika Oniki, David W. Johnston, E. Eisenmann, Theodore A. Parker, Fernando Costa Straube, Leonardo Esteves Lopes, Mark E. Berres, Robert Bleiweiss, Lajos Rózsa and José Maria Cardoso da Silva. Their work appears in journals such as Ornithological Applications, The Auk, Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, Ornithological Monographs and Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact