Edwin Gerow

428 citations
37 papers · 126 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Edwin Gerow

24 papers receiving 86 citations

Peers

Edwin Gerow
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Religious studies 56
  • Philosophy 47
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 15
  • Anthropology 23
  • Language and Linguistics 15
Replace J. A. B. van Buitenen with:
J. A. B. van Buitenen United States
Louis L. Martz United States
Juan Bautista Avalle-Arce United States
Regina Schwartz United States
David Bain United Kingdom
James Diggle United States
Louis H. Gray
J. L. Brockington United Kingdom
Mikeal C. Parsons United States
Patricia Clare Ingham United States
Edwin Gerow relative to J. A. B. van Buitenen United States J. A. B. van Buitenen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. A. B. van Buitenen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Gerow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Gerow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Gerow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Gerow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Gerow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Gerow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Gerow. The network helps show where Edwin Gerow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Gerow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edwin Gerow Line = papers co-authored together Edwin Gerow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197134
2 197628
3 199410
4 19936
5 19755
6
Śāstrārambha : inquiries into the preamble in Sanskrit
20084
7 19854
8
Why the Fish Laughed, and Other Matters Relating to (the Indian Sense of) "Humor"
20013
9 19923
10 20003
11
The jewel-necklace of argument : (the Vādaratnāvalī of Viṣṇudāsācārya)
19902
12 19842
13 19952
14 19792
15 19872
16 19892
17 19992
18
The plays of Kālidāsa : theater of memory
19991
19 19871
20 20041

About Edwin Gerow

Edwin Gerow is a scholar working on Religious studies, Philosophy, Language and Linguistics, Anthropology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 126 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian and Buddhist Studies (14 papers), Indian History and Philosophy (10 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (5 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (4 papers), Ancient Near East History (3 papers), Ancient Egypt and Archaeology (2 papers) and Humor Studies and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (56 citations), Philosophy (47 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (15 citations), Anthropology (23 citations) and Language and Linguistics (15 citations). Frequent co-authors include J. A. B. van Buitenen, A. K. Ramanujan, Johannes Bronkhorst, W. Crooke, McKim Marriott, Shahid Amin, E. Annamalai, Lee Siegel, Indira Viswanathan Peterson and Minoru Hara. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Oriental Society, Philosophy East and West, Medical Entomology and Zoology, Books Abroad and Harrassowitz eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact