Edwin Dean
Impact in
-
- Economic Theory and Policy
- Global trade and economics
-
- Economic Growth and Productivity
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
- Firm Innovation and Growth
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis
Papers in
-
- African history and culture studies 2
-
- Urban and Rural Development Challenges 1
- Co-authors
- Michael S. McPherson (1 shared paper)Charles R. Hulten (1 shared paper)Michael J. Harper (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Political Science Quarterly (2 papers)Monthly labor review (1 paper)American Journal of Agricultural Economics (1 paper)Economic Development and Cultural Change (1 paper)Journal of Policy Analysis and Management (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Edwin Dean
7 papers receiving 44 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 17
- Economics and Econometrics 53
- Development 2
- Political Science and International Relations 9
- Gender Studies 3
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin Dean. The network helps show where Edwin Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Edwin Dean, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The accuracy of the BLS productivity measures | 1999 | 32 |
| 2 | 1985 | 20 | |
| 3 | Plan implementation in Nigeria, 1962-1966 | 1974 | 8 |
| 4 | New Developments in Productivity Analysis | 2001 | 2 |
| 5 | The controversy over the quantity theory of money | 1965 | 2 |
| 6 | 1971 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 2 | |
| 8 | Studies in Price Formation in African Markets | 1962 | 1 |
| 9 | 1970 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 1 |
About Edwin Dean
Edwin Dean is a scholar working on Anthropology, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 10 papers that have together received 71 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (2 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (1 paper), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper), Manufacturing Process and Optimization (1 paper), Economic Growth and Development (1 paper), Economic Theory and Policy (1 paper), African studies and sociopolitical issues (1 paper) and Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (17 citations), Economics and Econometrics (53 citations), Development (2 citations), Political Science and International Relations (9 citations) and Gender Studies (3 citations). Edwin Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. McPherson, Charles R. Hulten and Michael J. Harper. Their work appears in journals such as Political Science Quarterly, Monthly labor review, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Economic Development and Cultural Change and Journal of Policy Analysis and Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.