This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin C. May's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin C. May with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin C. May more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin C. May. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin C. May. The network helps show where Edwin C. May may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin C. May
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin C. May.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin C. May based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin C. May. Edwin C. May is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (2015). Extrasensory Perception: Support, Skepticism, and Science.16 indexed citations
4.
May, Edwin C.. (2014). Star Gate: The U.S. Government's Psychic Spying Program/ Star Gate: Das Parapsychische Spionageprogramm der U.S.-Regierung/ Star Gate: El Programa De Espionaje Psiquico del Gobierno Norteamericano/ Star Gate: Le Programme D'espionnage Psychique Du Gouvernement Etats-Unien. Journal of Parapsychology. 78(1). 5.
5.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (2011). The Global Consciousness Project: Identifying the Source of the Psi. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.4 indexed citations
May, Edwin C., et al.. (2003). Skin Conductance Prestimulus Response: Analyses, Artifacts and a Pilot Study.43 indexed citations
9.
May, Edwin C.. (1998). Response to "Experiment One of the SAIC Remote Viewing Program: A Critical Re-Evaluation.". Journal of Parapsychology. 62(4). 309.
10.
May, Edwin C.. (1996). The American Institutes for Research Review of the Department of Defense's Star Gate Program: A Commentary. Journal of Parapsychology. 60(1). 3.15 indexed citations
11.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1995). DECISION AUGMENTATION THEORY: TOWARD A MODEL OF ANOMALOUS MENTAL PHENOMENA. Journal of Parapsychology. 59(3). 195.31 indexed citations
12.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1995). Applications of Decision Augmentation Theory. Journal of Parapsychology. 59(3). 221.7 indexed citations
13.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1994). Target and Sender Dependencies in Anomalous Cognition Experiments. Journal of Parapsychology. 58(3). 285.13 indexed citations
14.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1994). Managing the Target-Pool Bandwidth: Possible Noise Reduction for Anomalous Cognition Experiments. Journal of Parapsychology. 58(3). 303.10 indexed citations
15.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1994). Shannon Entropy: A Possible Intrinsic Target Property. Journal of Parapsychology. 58(4). 384.12 indexed citations
16.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1993). ANOMALOUS MENTAL PHENOMENA RESEARCH IN RUSSIA AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION: A FOLLOW UP. 4(3).6 indexed citations
17.
May, Edwin C., et al.. (1992). OVERVIEW OF CURRENT PARAPSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION. 3(3).4 indexed citations
18.
May, Edwin C. & Sarah Lewis. (1972). ReactionKr86(d,He3)Br85. Physical Review C. 5(1). 117–119.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.