Edward Moxon‐Browne
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Strategy and Management
- Development top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Topics
- Irish and British Studies (12 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers)Political Systems and Governance (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaContemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsInternational Affairs
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Edward Moxon‐Browne
44 papers receiving 445 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 342
- Political Science and International Relations 301
- Strategy and Management 49
- Development 31
- Economics and Econometrics 27
Countries citing papers authored by Edward Moxon‐Browne
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Moxon‐Browne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Moxon‐Browne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Moxon‐Browne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward Moxon‐Browne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Moxon‐Browne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Moxon‐Browne. The network helps show where Edward Moxon‐Browne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward Moxon‐Browne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward Moxon‐Browne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward Moxon‐Browne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward Moxon‐Browne. Edward Moxon‐Browne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | Turkey and the European Union: Divergent Discourses? | 0 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Edward Moxon‐Browne
Edward Moxon‐Browne is a scholar working on General Energy, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Irish and British Studies (12 papers), European Union Policy and Governance (5 papers) and Political Systems and Governance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (301 citations), Development (31 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (342 citations). Edward Moxon‐Browne has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Lucia Quaglia, Adrian Guelke, Rick Wilford, John D. Brewer, Philomena Murray and Ronald Weitzer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and International Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.