Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation
20071.1k citationsMorten Berg Jensen, Björn Johnson et al.Research Policyprofile →
Collective Learning, Tacit Knowledge and Regional Innovative Capacity
1999509 citationsClive Lawson, Edward LorenzRegional Studiesprofile →
The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises
2022258 citationsCyrielle Gaglio, Erika Kraemer‐Mbula et al.Technological Forecasting and Social Changeprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward Lorenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward Lorenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward Lorenz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward Lorenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward Lorenz. The network helps show where Edward Lorenz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward Lorenz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward Lorenz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward Lorenz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Edward Lorenz. Edward Lorenz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Gaglio, Cyrielle, Erika Kraemer‐Mbula, & Edward Lorenz. (2022). The effects of digital transformation on innovation and productivity: Firm-level evidence of South African manufacturing micro and small enterprises. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 182. 121785–121785.258 indexed citations breakdown →
Jensen, Morten Berg, Björn Johnson, Edward Lorenz, & Bengt‐Åke Lundvall. (2008). Forms of Knowledge, Modes of Innovation and Innovation Systems.9 indexed citations
8.
Jensen, Morten Berg, Björn Johnson, Edward Lorenz, & Bengt‐Åke Lundvall. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy. 36(5). 680–693.1123 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Lundvall, Bengt‐Åke & Edward Lorenz. (2007). Modes of Innovation and Knowledge Taxonomies in the Learning economy. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).16 indexed citations
10.
Jensen, Morten Berg, et al.. (2004). Absorptive Capacity, Forms of Knowledge and Economic Development. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).9 indexed citations
11.
Jensen, Morten Berg, et al.. (2004). CODIFICATION AND MODES OF INNOVATION. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).4 indexed citations
Lazaric, Nathalie & Edward Lorenz. (1998). Trust and Economic Learning. Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines. 8(2-3). 353–362.40 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.