Edward C. Reifenstein
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Genetics
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Nephrology top 10%
- Reproductive Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- D. H. StaelinGilbert S. GordanEdward L. ChambersLeon GoldmanHenry H. BlauB. F. BurkeT. L. WilsonW. J. Altenhoff
- Topics
- Hormonal and reproductive studies (6 papers)Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers)Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers)
- Journals
- NatureSciencePhysical Review Letters
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Edward C. Reifenstein
23 papers receiving 518 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 238
- Genetics 123
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 83
- Nephrology 65
- Reproductive Medicine 63
Countries citing papers authored by Edward C. Reifenstein
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward C. Reifenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward C. Reifenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward C. Reifenstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward C. Reifenstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward C. Reifenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward C. Reifenstein. The network helps show where Edward C. Reifenstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward C. Reifenstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward C. Reifenstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward C. Reifenstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward C. Reifenstein. Edward C. Reifenstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 46 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 197 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | K-BAND OBSERVATIONS OF VENUS AND JUPITER DURING 1966. | 1 |
| 8 | 34 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Edward C. Reifenstein
Edward C. Reifenstein is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Oceanography and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 625 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hormonal and reproductive studies (6 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (5 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (238 citations), Nephrology (65 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations). Edward C. Reifenstein has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include D. H. Staelin, Gilbert S. Gordan, Edward L. Chambers, Leon Goldman, Henry H. Blau, B. F. Burke, T. L. Wilson, W. J. Altenhoff, P. G. Mezger and R. Palmer Howard. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.