Edward C. Lim

93 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Edward C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 1.4k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.2k
  • Spectroscopy 482
  • Organic Chemistry 612
  • Materials Chemistry 741
Replace Michael R. Topp with:
Michael R. Topp United States
Georg Hohlneicher Germany
Alessandro Lami Italy
Hiroshi Nakatsuji Japan
Ivo Cacelli Italy
Mikhail V. Vener Russia
Ciro A. Guido Italy
E. Lippert Germany
Jörg Tatchen Germany
Arthur E. Bragg United States
Edward C. Lim relative to Michael R. Topp United States Michael R. Topp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael R. Topp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edward C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edward C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edward C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward C. Lim. The network helps show where Edward C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edward C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edward C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together Edward C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986238
2 1996138
3 2000124
4 200596
5 200089
6 200371
7 198765
8 201160
9 199259
10 200456
11 198855
12 200150
13 200846
14 200945
15 200037
16 200837
17 198435
18 200034
19 200333
20 201033

About Edward C. Lim

Edward C. Lim is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (57 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (46 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (25 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (18 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (14 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (13 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers) and Free Radicals and Antioxidants (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (1.4k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.2k citations), Spectroscopy (482 citations), Organic Chemistry (612 citations) and Materials Chemistry (741 citations). Edward C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Marek Z. Zgierski, Carlos A. Gonzalez, Hiroyuki Saigusa, Takashige Fujiwara, Allan L. L. East, Serguei Patchkovskii, D. C. Moule, Sheng N. Sun, William G. Kofron and Rovshan G. Sadygov. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics Letters and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact