Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda

13 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 234
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 220
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 207
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 153
  • Clinical Psychology 90
Replace Kam-Ping Yung with:
Kam-Ping Yung Hong Kong
Ben Zimmer United States
Sylvie Royant‐Parola France
Fee Benz Germany
Wataru Yamadera Japan
Julia Maruani France
Liza Ashbrook United States
Olivier Andlauer United Kingdom
Catherine Hatfield United Kingdom
Laura B. Palmese United States
Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda relative to Kam-Ping Yung Hong Kong Kam-Ping Yung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Kam-Ping Yung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda. The network helps show where Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda. Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 13
3
Clinical characteristics, outcome, and management of Staphylococcus epidermidis endophthalmitis
1
4 7
5 0
6 13
7 32
8 49
9 51
10 17
11 329
12 8
13
Coping with Bargains in the Ultimatum Game: The Triple Circuit Hypothesis
1
14 4

About Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda

Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 14 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (207 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (234 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations). Eduardo Ferracioli-Oda has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael H. Bloch, Catherine G. Coughlin, Jilian M. Mulqueen, Zachary D. Stuckelman, James F. Leckman, Álvaro Machado Dias, Joyce Hisae Yamamoto, Henrique Teruo Akiba, Carlos Eduardo Hirata and Marcelo Fernandes Costa. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026