Edo van Uitert

4.2k total citations
18 papers, 686 citations indexed

About

Edo van Uitert is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edo van Uitert has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 686 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 11 papers in Instrumentation and 3 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Edo van Uitert's work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers). Edo van Uitert is often cited by papers focused on Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (11 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (7 papers). Edo van Uitert collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Edo van Uitert's co-authors include Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, Catherine Heymans, T. Erben, H. Hildebrandt, Konrad Kuijken, T. Schrabback, Michael D. Gladders, H. K. C. Yee and M. Velander and has published in prestigious journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).

In The Last Decade

Edo van Uitert

18 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Edo van Uitert

INSTR

NHEP

AMPO

CVPR

M. Velander Netherlands

J. T. A. de Jong Netherlands

Reiko Nakajima United Kingdom

Jean Coupon Switzerland

M. Maturi Germany

T. D. Kitching United Kingdom

Johnny P. Greco United States

Y. Roehlly France

Ryoma Murata Japan

Adrienne Leonard France

M. Velander Netherlands

Edo van Uitert

714 ×1.1

360 ×1.1

INSTR

115 ×0.8

NHEP

129 ×1.7

AMPO

72 ×1.4

CVPR

Citations per year, relative to Edo van Uitert Edo van Uitert (= 1×) peers M. Velander

Countries citing papers authored by Edo van Uitert

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edo van Uitert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edo van Uitert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edo van Uitert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edo van Uitert

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edo van Uitert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edo van Uitert. The network helps show where Edo van Uitert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edo van Uitert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edo van Uitert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edo van Uitert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edo van Uitert. Edo van Uitert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Brouwer, Margot M., Vasiliy Demchenko, Joachim Harnois-Déraps, et al.. (2018). Studying galaxy troughs and ridges using weak gravitational lensing with the Kilo-Degree Survey. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 481(4). 5189–5209. 40 indexed citations

Viola, Massimo, Ian G. McCarthy, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, et al.. (2018). Multiwavelength scaling relations in galaxy groups: a detailed comparison of GAMA and KiDS observations to BAHAMAS simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 480(3). 3338–3355. 14 indexed citations

Cacciato, Marcello, Henk Hoekstra, Joop Schaye, et al.. (2017). Galaxy–galaxy lensing in EAGLE: comparison with data from 180 deg2 of the KiDS and GAMA surveys. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 471(3). 2856–2870. 9 indexed citations

Joachimi, Benjamin, et al.. (2017). The mass dependence of dark matter halo alignments with large-scale structure. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 474(1). 1165–1175. 25 indexed citations

Uitert, Edo van, Henk Hoekstra, Benjamin Joachimi, et al.. (2017). Halo ellipticity of GAMA galaxy groups from KiDS weak lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 467(4). 4131–4149. 36 indexed citations

Köhlinger, F., Massimo Viola, Benjamin Joachimi, et al.. (2017). KiDS-450: the tomographic weak lensing power spectrum and constraints on cosmological parameters. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 471(4). 4412–4435. 124 indexed citations

Uitert, Edo van & Benjamin Joachimi. (2017). Intrinsic alignment of redMaPPer clusters: cluster shape–matter density correlation. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 468(4). 4502–4512. 26 indexed citations

Uitert, Edo van & Petra Schneider. (2016). Systematic tests for position-dependent additive shear bias. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 6 indexed citations

Uitert, Edo van, David Gilbank, Henk Hoekstra, et al.. (2016). Weak-lensing-inferred scaling relations of galaxy clusters in the RCS2: mass-richness, mass-concentration, mass-bias, and more. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 20 indexed citations

10.

Uitert, Edo van, Marcello Cacciato, Henk Hoekstra, & Ricardo Herbonnet. (2015). Evolution of the luminosity-to-halo mass relation of LRGs from a combined analysis of SDSS-DR10+RCS2. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 15 indexed citations

11.

Schrabback, T., Stefan Hilbert, Henk Hoekstra, et al.. (2015). CFHTLenS: weak lensing constraints on the ellipticity of galaxy-scale matter haloes and the galaxy-halo misalignment. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 454(2). 1432–1452. 20 indexed citations

12.

Hudson, Michael J., B. Gillis, Jean Coupon, et al.. (2014). CFHTLenS: co-evolution of galaxies and their dark matter haloes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 447(1). 298–314. 95 indexed citations

13.

Velander, M., Edo van Uitert, Henk Hoekstra, et al.. (2013). CFHTLenS: the relation between galaxy dark matter haloes and baryons from weak gravitational lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 437(3). 2111–2136. 112 indexed citations

14.

Gillis, B., Michael J. Hudson, T. Erben, et al.. (2013). CFHTLenS: the environmental dependence of galaxy halo masses from weak lensing. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 431(2). 1439–1452. 23 indexed citations

15.

Cacciato, Marcello, Edo van Uitert, & Henk Hoekstra. (2013). Describing galaxy weak lensing measurements from tenths to tens of Mpc and up to z ∼ 0.6 with a single model. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 437(1). 377–390. 14 indexed citations

16.

Uitert, Edo van, Henk Hoekstra, T. Schrabback, et al.. (2012). Constraints on the shapes of galaxy dark matter haloes from weak gravitational lensing. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 44 indexed citations

17.

Uitert, Edo van, Henk Hoekstra, Marijn Franx, et al.. (2012). Stellar mass versus velocity dispersion as tracers of the lensing signal around bulge-dominated galaxies. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 549. A7–A7. 10 indexed citations

18.

Uitert, Edo van, Henk Hoekstra, M. Velander, et al.. (2011). Galaxy-galaxy lensing constraints on the relation between baryons and dark matter in galaxies in the Red Sequence Cluster Survey 2. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 534. A14–A14. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact