Edmund Jones
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Economics and Econometrics
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- Michael SweetingSimon G. ThompsonJanet T. PowellPinar UlugMatthew GloverMatthew J. BownJonathan MichaelsRegula S. von Allmen
- Topics
- Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (5 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicinePulmonary and Respiratory MedicineLiterature and Literary Theory
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Edmund Jones
13 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 266
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 205
- Surgery 74
- Economics and Econometrics 25
- Genetics 23
Countries citing papers authored by Edmund Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund Jones. The network helps show where Edmund Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund Jones. Edmund Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | Multiple Imputation for Informative Censoring [R package InformativeCensoring version 0.3.5] | 1 |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 125 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2 |
About Edmund Jones
Edmund Jones is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 14 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (205 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (266 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (21 citations). Edmund Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael Sweeting, Simon G. Thompson, Janet T. Powell, Pinar Ulug, Matthew Glover, Matthew J. Bown, Jonathan Michaels, Regula S. von Allmen, Katya L Masconi and David Epstein. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.