Edmund Flach
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Genetics
- Parasitology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marcus ClaußH. OuhelliJean‐Michel HattW. Jürgen StreichJ. C. CastellAndrew RouthJürgen HummelSylvia Ortmann
- Topics
- Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers)Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (6 papers)Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Edmund Flach
59 papers receiving 687 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Agronomy and Crop Science 174
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 150
- Ecology 150
- Genetics 134
- Parasitology 127
Countries citing papers authored by Edmund Flach
This map shows the geographic impact of Edmund Flach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edmund Flach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edmund Flach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edmund Flach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edmund Flach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edmund Flach. The network helps show where Edmund Flach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edmund Flach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edmund Flach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edmund Flach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edmund Flach. Edmund Flach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Capillaria hepatica (syn Calodium hepaticum) in primates in a zoological collection in the UK. | 10 |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 44 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | Coccidial infections of captive red lechwe (Kobus leche leche) at Edinburgh zoo, with a note of concurrent Trichuris sp. infections. | 1 |
About Edmund Flach
Edmund Flach is a scholar working on Equine, Parasitology and Small Animals, having authored 61 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (9 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (6 papers) and Veterinary Equine Medical Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (127 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (174 citations) and Small Animals (93 citations). Edmund Flach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Marcus Clauß, H. Ouhelli, Jean‐Michel Hatt, W. Jürgen Streich, J. C. Castell, Andrew Routh, Jürgen Hummel, Sylvia Ortmann, Angela Schwarm and Heribert Hofer. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and PLoS Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.