Edith Pierre-Jerome
About
In The Last Decade
Edith Pierre-Jerome
7 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Plant Science 318
- Molecular Biology 298
- Endocrinology 71
- Infectious Diseases 58
- Food Science 58
Countries citing papers authored by Edith Pierre-Jerome
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Pierre-Jerome's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Pierre-Jerome with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Pierre-Jerome more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Pierre-Jerome
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Pierre-Jerome. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Pierre-Jerome. The network helps show where Edith Pierre-Jerome may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Pierre-Jerome
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Pierre-Jerome. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Pierre-Jerome based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Pierre-Jerome. Edith Pierre-Jerome is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 69 | |
| 5 | 47 | |
| 6 | 107 | |
| 7 | 104 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.