Edith M. Lincoln
- Surgery top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Microbiology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Pamela DaviesJohn F. DalyDavid S. BrownEdward M. SewellSomchai BovornkittiCharlotte M. ZitrinAbraham SaiferRosa Lee Nemir
- Topics
- Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (25 papers)Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (16 papers)Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaPuerto Rico
In The Last Decade
Edith M. Lincoln
31 papers receiving 457 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Surgery 345
- Infectious Diseases 341
- Epidemiology 230
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 67
- Microbiology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Edith M. Lincoln
This map shows the geographic impact of Edith M. Lincoln's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith M. Lincoln with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith M. Lincoln more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edith M. Lincoln
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith M. Lincoln. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith M. Lincoln. The network helps show where Edith M. Lincoln may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith M. Lincoln
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith M. Lincoln. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith M. Lincoln based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith M. Lincoln. Edith M. Lincoln is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Tuberculosis in children | 12 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 144 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | COMMITTEE OF THE SECTION ON DISEASES OF THE CHEST: Primary Bacterial Resistance in Tuberculosis | 1 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | Indications for treatment of primary tuberculosis in children. | 1 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | ROUND table discussion: early diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in children. | 1 |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Edith M. Lincoln
Edith M. Lincoln is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Surgery and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 36 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (25 papers), Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis (16 papers) and Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (341 citations), Microbiology (52 citations) and Surgery (345 citations). Edith M. Lincoln has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Frequent co-authors include Pamela Davies, John F. Daly, David S. Brown, Edward M. Sewell, Somchai Bovornkitti, Charlotte M. Zitrin, Abraham Saifer, Rosa Lee Nemir, Edwin L. Kendig and John D. Martin. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, PEDIATRICS and The Journal of Pediatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.