Edith Kaan

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
10 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Edith Kaan is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Edith Kaan has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Edith Kaan's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (5 papers). Edith Kaan is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (5 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (5 papers). Edith Kaan collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Edith Kaan's co-authors include Tamara Y. Swaab, Edward Gibson, Phillip J. Holcomb, Anthony Harris, Laurie A. Stowe, Laura Sabourin, Christopher M. Barkley and Ryan C. Taylor and has published in prestigious journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Brain Research and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Edith Kaan

10 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Hit Papers

The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty 2000 2026 2008 2017 2000 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Edith Kaan United States 8 1.2k 888 275 214 116 10 1.3k
Wietske Vonk Netherlands 21 762 0.7× 727 0.8× 470 1.7× 386 1.8× 258 2.2× 33 1.2k
Eva M. Moreno Spain 13 1.3k 1.1× 881 1.0× 544 2.0× 172 0.8× 160 1.4× 33 1.5k
Robert Kluender United States 18 1.3k 1.1× 964 1.1× 407 1.5× 611 2.9× 246 2.1× 27 1.7k
Jörg D. Jescheniak Germany 24 1.9k 1.6× 1.6k 1.8× 831 3.0× 369 1.7× 268 2.3× 67 2.3k
Judith McLaughlin United States 9 974 0.8× 870 1.0× 215 0.8× 193 0.9× 68 0.6× 14 1.2k
Sergey Avrutin Netherlands 15 525 0.4× 500 0.6× 128 0.5× 270 1.3× 103 0.9× 39 768
Nancy Hildebrandt Canada 14 726 0.6× 660 0.7× 141 0.5× 94 0.4× 54 0.5× 20 845
Katy Carlson United States 13 495 0.4× 365 0.4× 535 1.9× 330 1.5× 175 1.5× 34 848
Andrew Barss United States 5 621 0.5× 519 0.6× 204 0.7× 299 1.4× 142 1.2× 6 902
Wilma van Donselaar Netherlands 9 534 0.5× 469 0.5× 782 2.8× 180 0.8× 272 2.3× 17 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Kaan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Kaan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Kaan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Kaan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Kaan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Kaan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Kaan. The network helps show where Edith Kaan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edith Kaan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edith Kaan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edith Kaan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edith Kaan. Edith Kaan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Stowe, Laurie A., Edith Kaan, Laura Sabourin, & Ryan C. Taylor. (2018). The sentence wrap-up dogma. Cognition. 176. 232–247. 47 indexed citations
2.
Kaan, Edith. (2007). Event‐Related Potentials and Language Processing: A Brief Overview. Language and Linguistics Compass. 1(6). 571–591. 106 indexed citations
3.
Kaan, Edith, et al.. (2006). Processing bare quantifiers in discourse. Brain Research. 1146. 199–209. 36 indexed citations
4.
Kaan, Edith & Tamara Y. Swaab. (2003). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research. 17(3). 621–635. 64 indexed citations
5.
Kaan, Edith. (2002). Investigating the Effects of Distance and Number Interference in Processing Subject-Verb Dependencies: An ERP Study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 31(2). 165–193. 89 indexed citations
6.
Kaan, Edith & Tamara Y. Swaab. (2002). The brain circuitry of syntactic comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 6(8). 350–356. 293 indexed citations
7.
Kaan, Edith, Anthony Harris, Edward Gibson, & Phillip J. Holcomb. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15(2). 159–201. 601 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Kaan, Edith. (1999). Syntax and semantics?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 3(9). 322–322. 2 indexed citations
9.
Kaan, Edith. (1998). Sensitivity to NP-type: processing subject-object ambiguities in Dutch. Journal of Semantics. 15(4). 335–354. 6 indexed citations
10.
Kaan, Edith. (1997). Processing subject-object ambiguities in Dutch. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 61 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026