Edith Botek

4.6k citations
108 papers · 3.9k indexed · h-index 34

Impact in

Papers in

Edith Botek

104 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

Edith Botek
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 1.7k
  • Organic Chemistry 2.2k
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 519
  • Materials Chemistry 1.6k
  • Spectroscopy 513
Replace D. Schweitzer with:
D. Schweitzer Germany
Joseph J. W. McDouall United Kingdom
Robert Zaleśny Poland
Dmitrij Rappoport United States
Yoon Sup Lee South Korea
Stephen K. Wolff Australia
James P. Riehl United States
Yuansheng Jiang China
A. Rassat France
Takashi Kawakami Japan
Edith Botek relative to D. Schweitzer Germany D. Schweitzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
D. Schweitzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Edith Botek

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Edith Botek's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edith Botek with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edith Botek more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Edith Botek

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edith Botek. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edith Botek. The network helps show where Edith Botek may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Edith Botek, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Edith Botek Line = papers co-authored together Edith Botek links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20231
3 20233
4 20234
5 20237
6 20234
7 20228
8 202125
9 202018
10 202014
11
Electron dropout events and flux enhancements associated with geomagnetic storms observed by PROBA-V/EPT from 2013 to 2019
20201
12 20153
13 201211
14 201089
15 201034
16 200833
17 200691
18 200618
19 200421
20 200213

About Edith Botek

Edith Botek is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biophysics, Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 108 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (49 papers), Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds (37 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (23 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (21 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (18 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (12 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (11 papers) and Photochemistry and Electron Transfer Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.7k citations), Organic Chemistry (2.2k citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (519 citations), Materials Chemistry (1.6k citations) and Spectroscopy (513 citations). Edith Botek has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Japan and France. Frequent co-authors include Benoı̂t Champagne, Masayoshi Nakano, Takashi Kubo, Ryohei Kishi, Kenji Kamada, Koji Ohta, Hideaki Takahashi, Kizashi Yamaguchi, Tomoshige Nitta and Akihiro Shimizu. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and ChemPhysChem.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026